Go to Post We can build it... we have the technology...better than it was before... Better...stronger...faster.... more PINK - Barry Bonzack [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 20:55
mrnoble's Avatar
mrnoble mrnoble is offline
teacher/coach
FRC #1339 (Angelbotics)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: denver, co
Posts: 961
mrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

Quote:
Originally Posted by asid61 View Post
Could you explain how a design that works in the offseason, code and mechanism, would fail in the season?
Sure, and for many other things besides swerve. The competition environment is exponentially more demanding on any robot than off-season work.
Reply With Quote
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 21:08
KamalRC's Avatar
KamalRC KamalRC is online now
Mechanical Lead 321
FRC #0321 (Robolancers)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 28
KamalRC is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnoble View Post
Sure, and for many other things besides swerve. The competition environment is exponentially more demanding on any robot than off-season work.
I agree 100% just because a system works in the off season until you know the game you will not know if that system can compete for the game.
Reply With Quote
  #33   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 21:12
jman4747's Avatar
jman4747 jman4747 is offline
Just building robots
AKA: Josh
FRC #4080 (Team Reboot)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 419
jman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

Quote:
Originally Posted by artK View Post
Iteration isn't always about saving weight, even on a drive base. In my four years with 254, we never used the same drivetrain twice. In 2012, we attached pistons and small levers to help push us over the bump. In 2013, we developed a PTO in the gearbox to climb the pyramid. In 2014, we had to make the gearbox have a low profile so the balls could fit inside the robot.



Personally, I would want to know what quintic hermite spline interpolation is, but I always liked polynomials more than trigonometry.



As a developer of a boring robot, I feel so awful about winning the championship, because our robot was so boring and uninspiring to watch.
It's literally the difference between looking at the spec for a car engine vs taking apart like 4 of them.
That's more of a general statement in response to the notion that winning is the metric of doing your best and that someone should build a subsystem because it wins and is easy for them rather than because it is the best they can do. It's not about what you make it's why. I am not putting down 254 or anyone else for doing well with a specific system. I'm also not saying you really have to be original you should however push your own envelope as much as possible.

To the weight thing... I mean make an example of a situation where a team would become comfortable with building something to the point where the only new thing done with it from year to year would be minor optimizations that don't generally teach anything new to those working on it precisely because they are so comfortable with it. What you described were tangible optimizations and upgrades made to better complete the game.
__________________
---------------------
Alumni, CAD Designer, machinist, and Mentor: FRC Team #4080

Mentor: Rookie FTC Team "EVE" #10458, FRC Team "Drewbotics" #5812

#banthebag
#RIBMEATS
#1620
Reply With Quote
  #34   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 21:13
Andrew Lawrence
 
Posts: n/a
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

Quote:
Originally Posted by asid61 View Post
Well, I look at it this way:
When somebody says, "Swerve is never necessary" it's basically just stating a universal truth. That quote just kind of irks me because of that.
Well I'm sorry, but it is a universal truth at the current time. The keyword isn't never, it's necessary. Swerve is never necessary. There is no situation in modern day FRC where the only possible solution is swerve. Until FIRST makes a game where swerve is required, the phrase, "Swerve is never necessary" will be a universal truth. If that statement were false, the only winners of Einstein would be swerve drives, and I know you're a smart kid who follows FRC and its history, so you know that's not the case. Can swerve be advantageous for some? Certainly. Is it ever necessary though? Never.

Last edited by Andrew Lawrence : 31-12-2014 at 21:21.
Reply With Quote
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 21:17
BJC's Avatar
BJC BJC is offline
Simplicity is Complicated!
AKA: Bryan Culver
FRC #0033 (The Killer Bees)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Kettering/Greenville
Posts: 707
BJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jman4747 View Post
I think I have a responsibility to be the best I can and for this team to be the best it can this year and next. To me that means that I should try to push the limits of my current abilities. I realize I sound too condicending towards teams who did make it to and win Einstein, however winning is not the primary perpose of building a great machine, building a great machine is. There is a difference between doing your best in rankings/placement than doing your best as an engineer and student. Our "best" issn't what gives us the best chance of winning it's what was hardest for us regardless of necessity.

Also "same old robot as 2k other teams" is unfair, I'm sorry. But if I can help it I won't try to have my systems fundamentally similar to most teams because that's the easiest rout. I'll make it because it's the best I can do with what I have.
You appear to have some pretty strong opinions, and that's fine. I just popped into this thread to say a couple things.

1. The most successful teams in this program are also consistently pushing their own boundaries in an attempt to be the best. Just because you don't know what those improvements are doesn't mean they aren't there.

2. I cannot speak for other teams, however, at the beginning of the build season our problem statement is to win the World Championship. As such, our robots are built for the sole purpose of winning matches. We implement features and push boundaries that we think will contribute to this goal.

3. When your team participates in this competition you start with a set of rules and a set objective. There isn't actually any room for your own definition of "great" engineering or what the "best" robot is. These are quantitatively defined by on-field results independent of thoughts, feelings, and opinions. That is the nature of competition.

Cheers, Bryan
__________________
robot robot robot? Robot. Robot? Robot!
-----------------Team 33------------------

Last edited by BJC : 31-12-2014 at 21:25.
Reply With Quote
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 21:23
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,224
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Lawrence View Post
Well I'm sorry, but it is a universal truth at the current time. They keyword isn't never, it's necessary. Swerve is never necessary. There is no situation in modern day FRC where the only possible solution is swerve. Until FIRST makes a game where swerve is required, the phrase, "Swerve is never necessary" will be a universal truth. If that statement were false, the only winners of Einstein would be swerve drives, and I know you're a smart kid who follows FRC and its history, so you know that's not the case. Can swerve be advantageous for some? Certainly. Is it ever necessary though? Never.
I know it's a universal truth. But it always will be, unless the rules starts demanding swerve drives. The rules also don't specify that you have to drive, so therefore it's unnecessary to drive. But it's useless to say that because driving is useful. Same with swerves. It's not necessary, but that means nothing (or almost nothing) in terms of whether it should be done or not.
Reply With Quote
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 21:29
piersklein piersklein is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 67
piersklein is a jewel in the roughpiersklein is a jewel in the roughpiersklein is a jewel in the roughpiersklein is a jewel in the rough
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jman4747 View Post
However winning is not the primary perpose of building a great machine, building a great machine is. There is a difference between doing your best in rankings/placement than doing your best as an engineer and student.
Some people here would disagree with this premise. For me at least, when I think of FRC I think of a competition. And quite frankly, "Winning is inspirational." I do genuinely care about building a robot that I can be proud of, and this year despite us being rookies, my team did very well with a robot that was not exceedingly complex. When I look at swerve drives, I am impressed by engineering complexity, but I will never put challenge above performance. The swerve drives I have been most impressed by are the ones that are the lightest, the most powerful, or the least resource intensive.
__________________
2016 Boston Semifinalists
2016 UMass Dartmouth Creativity Award, Quarterfinalist
2015 Northeastern Quarter Finalists (6th rank)
2015 UMass Dartmouth Winners
2014 RISM Rookie Inspiration Award, Semifinalists.
2014 NorthEastern Rookie All-star, Highest Rookie Seed, Semifinalists.
2014 NECMP- Highest Rookie Seed

Last edited by piersklein : 01-01-2015 at 12:18.
Reply With Quote
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 21:52
jman4747's Avatar
jman4747 jman4747 is offline
Just building robots
AKA: Josh
FRC #4080 (Team Reboot)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 419
jman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

If the only thing about FIRST that mattered was competition what then of GP? Why does the game change every year? What of the Chairman's award? None of those are necessary for competition. We are here primarily to learn and inspire not compete. The competition serves as a catalyst and goal not the primary focus of FIRST or FRC. That mentality of build a robot primarily to win and compete only hits part of the point. If I had the same opinion back in 2010 I wouldn't be here. I'd have said "wow that looks hard and not necessary therefore I will not do it" not "wow that looks hard, I should find a team somewhere." As a teenager I don't need to know what an FPGA is or the free speed of a CIM motor. Yet a while ago I decided to learn some interesting yet normally useless information for my day to day life. Why bother knowing how planetary gearboxes work? Yet it will be advantageous later in life as an engineer. Similarly: Swerve is advantageous from a learning perspective and competitively if done well. I don't need to know how, you don't need to know how but you will know that much more. Why did you join FRC to win a competition or to learn more about engineering, math, pizza, water games, and teamwork?
__________________
---------------------
Alumni, CAD Designer, machinist, and Mentor: FRC Team #4080

Mentor: Rookie FTC Team "EVE" #10458, FRC Team "Drewbotics" #5812

#banthebag
#RIBMEATS
#1620
Reply With Quote
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 22:27
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
On to my 16th year in FRC
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 8,515
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

We've wanted to make one for probably a decade now, and still never have. We've been doing FIRST for 14 years now, we have mentors who have been doing it nearly as long, we have full in-house CNC manufacturing capabilities, machining mentors, a very well educated programming mentor from a highly-esteemed institution, and students with 3 full years experience behind them. We have the capability to build two identical robots ( and have done so twice) and access to a full size practice field.

We have downloaded and studied the CAD models of other teams' swerve drives and have twice begun modeling one of our own.

We still have not built a swerve and it's not likely that we will for 2015.

Why not? Years ago our team decided that we would never build a swerve drive during build season unless we'd previously done it during the offseason., and that never happened.

What is our reasoning for that decision? We've determined that the marginal performance gains in the drive system do not outweigh the additional time requirements to design, fabricate, refine, and program it. That time can be spent further developing and refining other parts of the robot.

And this is what frustrates me a little bit about the current state of COTS items. Years ago, teams could gain a significant advantage by heavily investing in the design, development, and manufacturing of these complex systems. Now, you're at a large disadvantage if you choose to do something custom over buying it. Why, you've lost time you literally could have bought. But buy buying it, you've lost the learning process. We're teaching students how to pick things out of a catalog (which is a great skill to have!) rather than teaching them to make the things that are in the catalogs (or better yet not in any catalogs). But, that's another discussion for another thread.

Part of our "problem" is that we doall the manufacturing in house. We can't spend 4 weeks on CAD, send it out to be laser cut and bent on a CNC press brake, and get a robot back in 3 days. We don't have that kind of sponsor like some teams do. If we don't have the mill running on day 2, we don't finish. And that's with a WCD.
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004

Last edited by sanddrag : 31-12-2014 at 22:32.
Reply With Quote
  #40   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 23:03
wilderbuchanan wilderbuchanan is offline
Registered User
FRC #3408 (Killobyte Cubs)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 35
wilderbuchanan is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

My Team got the Wild Swerve kit from Team 221 before i got involved in the team and it didn't work out so well. It took us the summer and someof the fall to get it to be mechanically sound. We made a fatal mistake and didn't get the hubs thats allow for the wires to come up the middle. Our programmers worked the whole summer and fall on code. We gave them the robot the day before our fall comp it didn't work out. They then continued to work on the Swerve during the rest of the fall getting no results.
Even though i'm a freshman, i have been to competitions since 2012. I always saw the Swerve as the Holy Grail (1717). However after working with it i can tell you that you need to make sure you have the resources. You need to fully think it through even when buying the pre fabricated versions. Otherwise you will be getting a lot of over night shipping. It was also over the heads of our 4 programers who were used to meccanum drive. For a team with middle of the road fiancees I think that it was a bad decision even though it seemed super cool. Make sure to go through both the upside and downside for your team. The pre fabricated versions also way a lot as well (80x20). We will continue to work on the swerve drive over the next few years but it has become more of a long term goal for us.
Reply With Quote
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 23:21
artK artK is offline
Just Another Person
AKA: Art Kalb
no team (No Team)
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 119
artK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jman4747 View Post
That's more of a general statement in response to the notion that winning is the metric of doing your best and that someone should build a subsystem because it wins and is easy for them rather than because it is the best they can do. It's not about what you make it's why.
Emphasis mine. It's called FRC because it is a competition, where the best win. Your argument seems to be based on the premise that maximized learning is more important than winning the competition. I disagree, the choice of mechanism should not be based on how steep the learning curve is, because there is also learning in the iteration stage, and even if we don't learn the same things,we both come away learning something.

Quote:
I am not putting down 254 or anyone else for doing well with a specific system. I'm also not saying you really have to be original you should however push your own envelope as much as possible.
I am not offended, just a reminder to think about what you say.

Quote:
To the weight thing... I mean make an example of a situation where a team would become comfortable with building something to the point where the only new thing done with it from year to year would be minor optimizations that don't generally teach anything new to those working on it precisely because they are so comfortable with it.
Consider a team that has used the kitbot for a few years, not because they are comfortable with the kitbot, but because they are uncomfortable developing their own drivetrain because of the diversion of resources away from other mechanisms (which change almost every year, allowing for a wider range of new learning possibilities).
__________________
Art Kalb
Team 254 (2011-2014): Head Scout, Programmer
2011, 2014 World Champions
Reply With Quote
  #42   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2014, 23:52
VioletElizabeth's Avatar
VioletElizabeth VioletElizabeth is offline
Registered User
AKA: ECD
FRC #1868 (Space Cookies)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 58
VioletElizabeth is just really niceVioletElizabeth is just really niceVioletElizabeth is just really niceVioletElizabeth is just really niceVioletElizabeth is just really nice
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

I was looking at the graph, and realized that the spikes were not the offseason like I thought they were but instead during the season (or rather, the first 6 moths of the year, which is 2/3 during the season) (if I'm reading it correctly), except for this year. Seems like the advice to do it in the offseason first has sunk in.
Reply With Quote
  #43   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-01-2015, 01:48
MichaelBick MichaelBick is offline
Registered User
FRC #1836 (MilkenKnights)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 734
MichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant future
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

Quote:
Originally Posted by asid61 View Post
"The best drivetrain" can mean a lot of things depending on the game. But provided the programming and design work are done pre-season, swerve is not inherently disadvantageous.
It is completely dependent on what type of swerve you are running, but in all swerves you use up more motors and in independent swerve you actually tend to push worse(wheels come off the ground)
__________________
Team 1836 - The Milken Knights
2013 LA Regional Champions with 1717 and 973
2012 LA Regional Finalists with 294 and 973
To follow Team 1836 on Facebook, go to http://www.facebook.com/MilkenKnights
To go to our website, go to http://milkenknights.com/index.html
Reply With Quote
  #44   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-01-2015, 02:16
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,224
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelBick View Post
It is completely dependent on what type of swerve you are running, but in all swerves you use up more motors and in independent swerve you actually tend to push worse(wheels come off the ground)
Put when you push, you can choose to push in exactly the direction you want, which may lend a greater advantage.
Plus, why push when you can a) lock wheels in an x and not move at all or b) Leroy Jenkins out of there.
Reply With Quote
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-01-2015, 03:21
Dunngeon Dunngeon is offline
Pumped
AKA: Ryan
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Posts: 299
Dunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 2015, Year of swerves?

Quote:
Originally Posted by asid61 View Post
Put when you push, you can choose to push in exactly the direction you want, which may lend a greater advantage.
Plus, why push when you can a) lock wheels in an x and not move at all or b) Leroy Jenkins out of there.
Do you have any first hand experience with this x arrangement you keep referring to? As a drive coach, our drivers have never had issues pushing a swerve with x locked wheels, except in the case where we are 90lbs and they are 120lbs.
__________________
(2015-?): 973
(2012-2015): 955

Last edited by Dunngeon : 01-01-2015 at 03:32.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi