Quote:
Originally Posted by AquaMorph
They also said about 1000 match played. With an alliance of 3 teams that is 10 matches per team. With 4 teams it increases to 13.33. It is interesting that the 3 works out to a perfect integer. Maybe that means alliances are staying to 3 per team this year but this is all speculation with estimated numbers.
|
As per the administrative manual, the total number of teams on the field at once is staying to 6, so either we're staying 3v3 or its going to 2v2v2 or 6v0. Due to the AndyMark field its likely two alliances, so 3v3 is almost certain *Knocks on wood*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landonh12
I doubt they would use ten fields. I'm seeing them just reusing two of the regular division fields for Einstein.
|
There is a lot of space in that dome, I doubt there would be an un-solvable issue with fitting 10. Remember, the Dome and its attached convention center is all for FRC now, not all four FIRST programs. If needed they could easily push all non-field activities/items into the adjacent convention center, leaving the entire dome for purely fields.
I can't remember where, but some FIRST high employee (maybe a past president) mentioned that they didn't want to reuse another field for Einstein, because in that a big percentage of teams would get to play on the Einstein field while others did not, and also the Einstein fields wouldn't be "pristine" as they are currently.
As for names, I'd assume they'd keep the current four, so it means we need four more extremely influential scientistst. Tesla has got to be one. Other than that, possibly Pasteur (like pasteurizing liquids), Darwin, Bernoulli, Maxwell, or Edison. Maybe Faraday also. For the younger crowd, possibly one for Hawking or Goodall?
Oh yeah, and having Einstein quarter-finals is the coolest thing ever.
Now, most of the replies are very tactful when they are questioning a teams' design... but some are simply stupid. Keep your heads.
- Andy Baker [more] 
02-01-2015, 19:40
(since 2004)
Hybrid Mode
