|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
You see those bumps called the scoring platforms? Those are going to going to cause all sorts of headaches for mecanums. 5-wheel strafe drive with the strafe wheel on a pneumatic suspension should work well, I think.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
I don't think there is a need to climb those, just go around them.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
This. Mecanums won't handle the bumps well, also mecanums need a very even weight distribution to work properly, I imagine there are going to be a lot of unevenly distributed robots this year...
Last edited by Jonathan Norris : 03-01-2015 at 11:51. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
I would try to set the center of gravity of the robot with the game piece, so when you lift it's balanced.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
The incline is 16 degrees, the height is two inches. This is from page 8 of the game manual. These values are nominal but the official values are in the field drawing.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
The angle of the ramp is 16 degrees, and the 'hypotenuse' is 7.125 inches. 7.125*sin(16) works out to 1.96 inches.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
Quote:
I'm not saying they'll be undriveable, I'm just saying they're going to make auto and certain precision tasks a wee bit more challenging and error prone than they need to be. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
From our team's experience, the only time that mecanums have ever had troubles were on the bridges in 2012. Even then, the problem was the lower coefficient of friction rather than getting up on them, and we were still able to balance 2 robots better than most teams.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
never used macanums before but really considering it this year. what is the prefered gearbox for these?
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
If you have not prototyped mechanum or done it before, I would not recommend bringing it out this season. It doesn't seem difficult at first, but you will end up spending far too much time on your drive train instead of allocating proper time to your mechanisms.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2015: Year of the Mecanum
The biggest hitch in developing a mecanum drivetrain is code. It requires lots of code testing. The hardware is much easier. The wheels are placed in standard configuration and require very minor differences in hardware required from a 4wd skid. The biggest hitch in the hardware is that you need four separate transmissions.
1058 has used 9:1 transmissions for a few years on our mecanum drives. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|