Go to Post Ask two different FIRSTers for an opinion, get three different answers! - pfreivald [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2015, 23:20
Shaffer Shaffer is offline
Registered User
FRC #4610
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bastrop, TX
Posts: 3
Shaffer is an unknown quantity at this point
Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

My team is debating whether it would be more useful to build a robot that can stack totes or place containers on top of totes.

It seems like a good "container bot" might be picked by an alliance captain in the finals because of its specialty.

However, the "container bot" doesn't seem like it will be very useful on its own (especially if it's randomly paired with no tote-stacking robots), and if it can't stack the container accurately well... mmm... not so good.

I figure there will probably be lots of good "tote bots" (maybe for good reason), so "container bots" might find a niche.

Thoughts?
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2015, 23:23
Jeffy's Avatar
Jeffy Jeffy is offline
Retired, for now
AKA: Jeff Gier
FRC #2410 (Metal Mustang Robotics) #159 (Alpine Robotics)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Fort Collins
Posts: 523
Jeffy has a brilliant futureJeffy has a brilliant futureJeffy has a brilliant futureJeffy has a brilliant futureJeffy has a brilliant futureJeffy has a brilliant futureJeffy has a brilliant futureJeffy has a brilliant futureJeffy has a brilliant futureJeffy has a brilliant futureJeffy has a brilliant future
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

I think most bots that are tote-bots can become tote + container bots with a few small modifications.
__________________
Metal Mustang Robotics 2410 (2008-2011)
2008 STL Rookie All-Star
2010 GKC Finalists
2010 OKC Champions
Alpine Robotics 159 (2012-)
2012 CO Finalists

700 miles from home, 2 miles from FRC. Life is good.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2015, 23:30
tStano tStano is offline
Registered User
AKA: Sparks
no team
Team Role: Electrical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 177
tStano will become famous soon enough
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

Container bots can get points on their own, assuming they're decent at their job.

They can push a tote into a scoring zone without a "tote manipulator"(possibly a stack of 2 straight from the human player). They can also have a driving alliance partner do this. They can then get litter from a human player, which is possible, as shown here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sH0Gv2w8l0E

Then they can stack that container on top of the crate(or stack of 2 crates). This 'stack' is worth 12 points, 18 points if its 2 totes high. You could conceivably do this 7 times in a qualification match(if you get all containers from middle(which I imagine you'd start doing in auto), which is an appreciable number of points, 84 or 126. Depending on the efficiency of a tote bot(and the efficiency of a container bot), this could be more points than a tote bot in a match. Their 'stack'(with 1 tote, container, and litter) is worth as much as a 6-high stack. With 2 totes, they're doing even better.

Last edited by tStano : 04-01-2015 at 23:31. Reason: fixed tense issues
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2015, 23:44
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,745
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffy View Post
I think most bots that are tote-bots can become tote + container bots with a few small modifications.
I think a really efficient tote-bot is probably going to be a pretty inefficient container bot. A good tote-bot is going to be carrying several totes, and many mechanisms like that aren't going to modify easily into container movers.

Also, since my team has taken to calling the containers "recycling bins", we're calling these two options "Totes Ma Goats" and "Mercedes Bins". We're still looking at our feasibility for both designs at the moment.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2015, 23:52
Dunngeon Dunngeon is offline
Pumped
AKA: Ryan
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Posts: 299
Dunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond reputeDunngeon has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik View Post
I think a really efficient tote-bot is probably going to be a pretty inefficient container bot. A good tote-bot is going to be carrying several totes, and many mechanisms like that aren't going to modify easily into container movers.

Also, since my team has taken to calling the containers "recycling bins", we're calling these two options "Totes Ma Goats" and "Mercedes Bins". We're still looking at our feasibility for both designs at the moment.
I disagree, I believe they aren't mutually exclusive for excellence. However, I don't think converting a tote-stack bot to tote+bin bot is as simple as a few small modifications.
__________________
(2015-?): 973
(2012-2015): 955
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2015, 00:04
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,745
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunngeon View Post
I disagree, I believe they aren't mutually exclusive for excellence. However, I don't think converting a tote-stack bot to tote+bin bot is as simple as a few small modifications.
I wholeheartedly agree that an efficient tote+bin bot is possible, and I suspect there are a few dozen teams working on the design right now. It just that you have to pursue that integrated design up front, not as an add-on/patch later. Next time I'll add more weasel words than just "probably" and "many mechanisms".
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2015, 00:29
wilderbuchanan wilderbuchanan is offline
Registered User
FRC #3408 (Killobyte Cubs)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 35
wilderbuchanan is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffy View Post
I think most bots that are tote-bots can become tote + container bots with a few small modifications.
I 100% agree. the width of the can is 18" and width of tote is 17" so making either 1 arm that can pick up both or 2 arms that are interchangeable seems pretty easy.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2015, 00:46
Rangel's Avatar
Rangel Rangel is offline
John Rangel
FRC #0842 (Falcon Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 745
Rangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

By Container Bot, I assume it's a robot that is designed to also grab the 4 middle containers during auto or at the start of teleop. A robot designed and programmed to do this as well as stack the containers is a lot less likely to have efficient tote stacking. There will be very few teams that have both since it's a lot harder for these bots to win a regional. Even at the finals of a regional, a container specialist won't be incredibly useful until more than 3 stacks are made. I think tote+container robots will be a lot more common than a few dozen teams but these teams will probably not be able to go for the 4 middle recycling containers.
__________________
2012 Dean's List Winner
2011-2014 Arizona Regional Winners
2016 Las Vegas Regional Winner
2014-? Mentor


  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2015, 01:21
Skyehawk's Avatar
Skyehawk Skyehawk is offline
Nuts N' Bolts
AKA: Skye Leake
FRC #0876 (Thunder Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Northwood, ND
Posts: 271
Skyehawk is a name known to allSkyehawk is a name known to allSkyehawk is a name known to allSkyehawk is a name known to allSkyehawk is a name known to allSkyehawk is a name known to all
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

I've been struggling with this as well, container bots have what I would like to call ''the perfect niche'' but long ago my team accepted the reality that in order to win regionals you needed to be the scoring team. With defensive menuvers nullified this year d the introduction of Qualification Average being a scoring not is more important than ever. You all have to be able to hold your own. And while the highest scoring natchs might include a container not there is no guarantee that every match will be a perfect match-up for you. The QA needs to be kept up if you are planning on picking, and I don't see container bots managing to do that.
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2015, 10:04
RunawayEngineer RunawayEngineer is offline
Master Commander of All Things Tech
AKA: Ches
FRC #0801 (Horsepower)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Merritt Island
Posts: 66
RunawayEngineer is a splendid one to beholdRunawayEngineer is a splendid one to beholdRunawayEngineer is a splendid one to beholdRunawayEngineer is a splendid one to beholdRunawayEngineer is a splendid one to beholdRunawayEngineer is a splendid one to beholdRunawayEngineer is a splendid one to behold
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tStano View Post
Container bots can get points on their own, assuming they're decent at their job.

They can push a tote into a scoring zone without a "tote manipulator"(possibly a stack of 2 straight from the human player). They can also have a driving alliance partner do this. They can then get litter from a human player, which is possible, as shown here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sH0Gv2w8l0E

Then they can stack that container on top of the crate(or stack of 2 crates). This 'stack' is worth 12 points, 18 points if its 2 totes high. You could conceivably do this 7 times in a qualification match(if you get all containers from middle(which I imagine you'd start doing in auto), which is an appreciable number of points, 84 or 126. Depending on the efficiency of a tote bot(and the efficiency of a container bot), this could be more points than a tote bot in a match. Their 'stack'(with 1 tote, container, and litter) is worth as much as a 6-high stack. With 2 totes, they're doing even better.
With those kinds of numbers, I can see a very successful Alliance having 2 stacking robots and 1 Bin robot. The Bin machine will spend the match grabbing bins, placing Litter in them from the HP slot (directly or indirectly), placing the Bin either on a stack or out of the way (until a stack is ready), and repeating.
I think that this would fill out the match time for an average capability robot and add some decent points.
Operating on its own without the ability to lift totes at all, this machine could make 12 point stacks (pushing 1 tote up and placing a Littered Bin on top), which is (probably) easier than the equivalent 6-tall Tote stack.
Pro: A one trick pony is easier to optimize
Con: Dependent on other stackers for full potential; dependent on the # of Bins available
I think that a robot that can perform those tasks reliably will probably seed lower than the consistent Tote stackers, but would be valuable in Playoffs.
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2015, 10:19
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 6,033
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

Without having tried to design a robot yet, my feeling is that a combination robot that can make small stacks, but reliably put a container upright on any stack, would get you further than a robot that can only make tall stacks, but not put a container on those tall stacks.

It won't be easy.
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2015, 10:28
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,745
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyehawk View Post
I've been struggling with this as well, container bots have what I would like to call ''the perfect niche'' but long ago my team accepted the reality that in order to win regionals you needed to be the scoring team. With defensive menuvers nullified this year d the introduction of Qualification Average being a scoring not is more important than ever. You all have to be able to hold your own. And while the highest scoring natchs might include a container not there is no guarantee that every match will be a perfect match-up for you. The QA needs to be kept up if you are planning on picking, and I don't see container bots managing to do that.
It really depends on your team's capabilities and goals, and the makeup of your regional. If you can build a bot that can carry multiple totes and a recycle bin all at once and stack them quickly, then congrats. You're in or near the 254/1114/etc. level of design and building. Your bot can address most of the game challenges and you should do well if everything works fast enough.

If your capabilities limit you to a single tote + bin or multi-tote only robot, then you have to look at your goals and the make up of your regionals. We're figuring on seeing a fair number of bin-only or super multi-tote+bin robots, so we're looking at being a really good multi-tote robot in a supporting role, and falling back to a 2-crate+bin robot if the multi-tote prototyping doesn't pan out.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2015, 10:55
The_ShamWOW88's Avatar
The_ShamWOW88 The_ShamWOW88 is offline
Senior Mentor/Coach
FRC #0157 (Aztechs)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Marlborough
Posts: 343
The_ShamWOW88 is a splendid one to beholdThe_ShamWOW88 is a splendid one to beholdThe_ShamWOW88 is a splendid one to beholdThe_ShamWOW88 is a splendid one to beholdThe_ShamWOW88 is a splendid one to beholdThe_ShamWOW88 is a splendid one to beholdThe_ShamWOW88 is a splendid one to behold
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffy View Post
I think most bots that are tote-bots can become tote + container bots with a few small modifications.
I think container bots can become tote bots in the same fashion...
__________________
"The best way to predict the future is design it"

"Striving for excellence through inspiration"
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2015, 12:29
Zebra_Fact_Man's Avatar
Zebra_Fact_Man Zebra_Fact_Man is offline
]\/[ Go Blue!
AKA: Solomon
FRC #1076 (Pi Hi Samurai)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 473
Zebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant futureZebra_Fact_Man has a brilliant future
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

I see it this way:
a tote bot isn't worth much on its own (12 pts max) but a container bot also isn't worth much alone either (no points if not on tote, only 10 pts if container/litter on 1 tote). Either to single function bots need to work together or you need to be able to handle both (more complicated).
__________________
My Journey in FIRST:

Mentor/Coach/Engineer
2014-2017: Team 1076 - Pi Hi Samurai
____ 2014: Team 5220 - The Rockets
2009-2014: Team 313 - The Bionic Union/Bionic Zebras
Student
2006-2009: Team 313 - The Bionic Union
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2015, 13:20
mac mac is offline
Registered User
AKA: Thomas (just give me a crabcake)McCubbin
FRC #0686 (Bovine Intervention/Jagbots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Mt.Airy Md.
Posts: 53
mac is a name known to allmac is a name known to allmac is a name known to allmac is a name known to allmac is a name known to allmac is a name known to all
Re: Tote Bot vs. Container Bot?

Hold on boys and girls. Mentor Mac here. You all about to have a cow. Have you every gone fishing with a pole? Have you every roped a horse with a rope? How much of a footprint do you think a one inch shaft, pole, rod, square tubing, etc. is going to take. Slam your fiberglass rod/pole on top. Some motors, a few pulleys and/or eye outlets, and rope. Done. Now you go fishing, hooking, snaring, or rope a dope. Come on all boys and girls. I know what your thinking. You got some kinda metal transformer arm coming out to get this green bin. Come on gents and ladies. K.I.S.S. Any robot. All robots. Big and small robots. Slow and fast robots. Etc. Can and should put the K.I.S.S. on there BOT. Every one! Can play the whole game period.
God Bless and be safe
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi