Go to Post They have a Woodie Flowers Finalist, Outstanding Volunteer and numerous UFH Awards to demonstrate this as well. You do not receive any of these accolades without doing something right. - J Flex 188 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2015, 11:11
H.A.L.'s Avatar
H.A.L. H.A.L. is offline
Registered User
AKA: Michael Keim
FRC #2468 (Team Appreciate)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 21
H.A.L. is on a distinguished road
Re: How to win Engineering Inspiration award???

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrTechCenter View Post
The best way to win an award is to not try to win an award.
This.
We won EI at our champs devision last year. We had never won EI at any regional ever and it wasn't on many of our radars.
This advice is also what most every Hall of Fame team says about the Championship Chairman's Award - though that advice is more specific to not doing outreach activities with the intent on them looking good on Chairman's submissions. Similarly, I would recommend not doing engineering related outreach/projects just for EI (of course that would be difficult to do anyway since I have heard differing opinions on what EI recognizes even from a number of judges - the manual is the only reliable tool).
I would recommend that, in your pit, you effectively pitch both your robot and, more importantly for this IMO, your teams outreach (STEM related in particular), since I have consistently been told it is an award decided by technical judges through pit conversations. This could include handouts and practiced talkers. I posted the documents we gave to judges last year here (the two middle links on the post): http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...48#post1391848

Edit: I meant to say non-technical judges in the pit (as opposed to Chairman's judges), not technical judges.
(I too have heard EI is considered by some to be a runner up for Chairman's or Chairman's judged by pit judges. I prefer to think of it as an award recognizing engineering outeach and impact on engineering. Though based on my observations at regionals it is often given to teams who were great Chairman's canidates, but then again it would make sense for such teams to be up for both awards.)
__________________
FIRST® Team 2468 Alumnus, FIRST Dean's List Finalist
2014 FIRST Championship Curie Division Engineering Inspiration Award
2014 Hub City Regional Chairman's Award
2014 Hub City Regional Winners
2014 Alamo Regional Finalists
2014 Bayou Regional Finalists
2014 Hub City FIRST Dean's List Finalist Award (For Michael Keim)
2014 Alamo Woodie Flowers Finalist Award (For Mentor Scott McMahon)
2014 Alamo Entrepreneurship Award
2014 Hub City Entrepreneurship Award
2014 Bayou Entrepreneurship Award

2013 Hub City Regional Chairman's Award
2013 FIRST Championship Archimedes Division Semifinalists
2013 Alamo Regional Winners
2013 Hub City Regional Woodie Flowers Finalist Award (For Coach Norman Morgan)
2013 Alamo Regional Engineering Excellence Award

Last edited by H.A.L. : 06-01-2015 at 00:04. Reason: Techical vs Nontechnical Judges
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:26.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi