|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Possible Robot Design?
I was just thinking, since the frame perimeter rules were taken away, one could theoretically build a VEX-type robot which is basically a crate containing the robot(s) which fall out after the end of auton.
Are there any rules that specifically prevent the construction of two 3-CIM robots that are electrically/mechanically connected? The only rule problem I can see would be G25, but that doesn't seem very relevant either. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible Robot Design?
I suppose that as long as you control the robot with the same battery/roboRio/other one-of components, and have all 8 sides of your "robot" have number displays, nothing is stopping you from doing that.
Exactly what benefit are you trying to achieve from that? Last edited by CalTran : 06-01-2015 at 18:32. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible Robot Design?
I was just considering what ways to score points, and a stacking efficiency was one of the things that I considered. If you can separately push 2-high stacks, your stacking speed would increase.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible Robot Design?
You could have a bot that has space for a tote inside of it (as a lift/intake/whatever) and have a mini-bot sit in there and deploy at the start of the match.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible Robot Design?
Interesting idea. To be sure I'd say take it up with the Q&A tomorrow, but one of the first issues that comes to mind is the degree of difficulty that would come from trying to drive two separate robots that are mechanically connected.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
So basically you want two robots but they actually are connected but will be used for different jobs? What do you have in mind for each "robot"?
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Possible Robot Design?
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|