|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question for teams who've run Butterfly Drives
Quote:
We call this 2+2. It works just like you'd expect. The turning point shifts in-between the two traction wheels. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Question for teams who've run Butterfly Drives
We ended up with half an Octanum (Hexanum?) in 2011 due to weight. 4 mecanums, 2 lower geared traction wheels we could drop for extra pushing power, less turnability, etc. We just modified the drive mapping in the 2+2 mode to drive the mecanums less than the stickies. It worked fairly well for us. Yes, the pivot point moved between the traction wheels. Turned ridiculously well thanks to the angled force vectors on the mecanums.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question for teams who've run Butterfly Drives
Thanks all, that's good feedback. I'm thinking of a way for a regular tank drive to shift its turning center relatively easily as a means to escape pins, "walk sideways", or just drive better in forward or reverse. More to come this summer if I give some time to it.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|