Mount Middle Slide Wheel

[Jarren Harkema]

Originally Posted by dradoxen

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you were to move your center wheels to be in between your other two sets at 90 degrees, you would not need a suspension.

This design does require extra weight, with an extra gearbox, wheel, and support, because you need a center wheel on both ends of the robot but as a team with less build capabilities we found it to be easier to implement than a suspension.

Am I missing anything with this?

This was our thinking. Though we are concerned with all 3 wheels being in contact with the ground at all times. So perhaps still having a passive system that provides some force downward on the slide wheels, but has enough travel to be compressed if need be over the platform? We still need to figure out how to mount these the kit chassis. If anyone has any ideas it would be appreciated.

[jeremylee]

We are going to try putting our strafe omni in line with our front drive omnis. This should work well when holding totes as most weight is on the front. Without totes, we will use a gyro and compensate for turn by diff steering the outer wheels a little. Might not be perfect, will see how it works.

For mounting, I'm thinking we purchase another inner rail to bolt in place and mount gearbox to with live hex and a bearing in the front rail. Probably need to drill out a wheel bolt hole to a hex bearing as we won't want any drop.

[Arpan]

3061 is using a 'fork' style suspension where the gearbox drives one of two wheels into the ground. We like it because unlike spring systems it does not take weight off of our drive wheels when the strafing wheel is unpowered.

[RonnieS]

It is not necessary to have the strafe wheel on a suspension. That being said, make sure you have a very good way to drive around the field and not hang up. We have gotten away without one so it eliminates complexity.
-Ronnie

[Joseph Smith]

Originally Posted by Arpan

3061 is using a 'fork' style suspension where the gearbox drives one of two wheels into the ground. We like it because unlike spring systems it does not take weight off of our drive wheels when the strafing wheel is unpowered.

Sounds like what 148 did in 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRwvQ2D_B-c
very cool design, my biggest concern would be keeping the strafe straight with only a single strafe wheel contacting the ground.

[GeeTwo]

Originally Posted by jeremylee

We are going to try putting our strafe omni in line with our front drive omnis. This should work well when holding totes as most weight is on the front. Without totes, we will use a gyro and compensate for turn by diff steering the outer wheels a little. Might not be perfect, will see how it works.

For mounting, I'm thinking we purchase another inner rail to bolt in place and mount gearbox to with live hex and a bearing in the front rail. Probably need to drill out a wheel bolt hole to a hex bearing as we won't want any drop.

Unless you're about to tip over, this will always introduce a torque so that the front will turn in the direction of the strafe. You can correct, but it's better to have a system that almost works without the feedback loop than one which is uncontrollable without it. The COG is the best place - the question is, with how much load to you optimize? We're looking to mount our strafe wheel onto a piece of aluminum angle or two which bolt to the holes on the top and bottom of the side rails (we're using the KOP chassis). Then, we can adjust this placement relatively easily when we find the COG. This could still be used with sprung suspensions.

[jeremylee]

Originally Posted by GeeTwo

Unless you're about to tip over, this will always introduce a torque so that the front will turn in the direction of the strafe. You can correct, but it's better to have a system that almost works without the feedback loop than one which is uncontrollable without it. The COG is the best place - the question is, with how much load to you optimize? We're looking to mount our strafe wheel onto a piece of aluminum angle or two which bolt to the holes on the top and bottom of the side rails (we're using the KOP chassis). Then, we can adjust this placement relatively easily when we find the COG. This could still be used with sprung suspensions.

Agree it's not ideal, but we want to cross the scoring platform without getting hung up and wothout the complexity of a raiseable wheel. If it becomes a problem even with a gyro, we may add another omni on the other side.

[GeeTwo]

Originally Posted by jeremylee

Agree it's not ideal, but we want to cross the scoring platform without getting hung up and wothout the complexity of a raiseable wheel. If it becomes a problem even with a gyro, we may add another omni on the other side.

If you do, put it on a separate gearbox, or have a differential between them so that you don't create a counter-torque when rotating or turning.

[jeremylee]

Originally Posted by GeeTwo

If you do, put it on a separate gearbox, or have a differential between them so that you don't create a counter-torque when rotating or turning.

Agreed.

[mrjagdad]

We too are going to have mount the slider wheel in the middle.
I am concerned about it hitting the ramp.
Does anyone have a picture or drawing of a mount involving a spring?

Thanks in advanced.

[BOSS]

We are running a slide drive, we are using a pneumatic cylinder to drive the slide drive down, so far we have not had an issue with going over the ramp. We put the center wheel on with its own gear box that tilts in and out of the frame.