|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What is the priority or emphasis for your drive train. | |||
| Maximum speed? |
|
9 | 9.57% |
| Maximum torque? |
|
10 | 10.64% |
| Balance of speed and torque? |
|
56 | 59.57% |
| Other? |
|
19 | 20.21% |
| Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Recycle Rush: Speed, Torque, or Both
Now that we have all had a week+ to contemplate our strategies and designs, there is an aspect of this game that I would like to open a discussion on.
The field that we play on this year is about half of what we have used in the past. Granted there are only 3 robots on it, and there are a lot of game pieces, but over all, the area we drive in has been greatly reduced. So the topic I would like to discuss is, "What do you aim for with your drive train design?" With the field being smaller, is top speed a consideration? With the tight quarters, do you place an emphasis on torque to help with maneuverability? Is too much torque going to be a problem? Will a good balance of both be a better choice? Single speed or multispeed gearbox? 2 CIM, 4 CIM, 6 CIM, 4 CIM + 2 mini's, all mini's? Holonomic, Mechanum, Swerve, WCD, 4 WD, KOP? All of these can also be answered by "other" of course and I'm sure there are other considerations I have not mentioned so feel free to bring them up. As you walk through your answers, please give a bit of your reasoning behind your choices. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|