|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
Well like I said it depends on an alliances capabilities but looking strictly at the points awarded to number of game pieces used the noodle in the bin is the best way to go. Especially since the highest level of play will see noodles in stacked bins. However if there is 5 seconds left in the match and you have no chance of getting in a noodle in a bin, by all means get the noodle on the other side of the field or get it in the landfill.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
How are you going to get a litter onto the other side of the field or into the landfill with 5 seconds left in the match?
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
Throw it over the alliance wall.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
Quote:
LITTER may be introduced onto the FIELD only during TELEOP and only in the following ways: A. through the LITTER CHUTE, or B. over the ALLIANCE WALL prior to the last twenty (20) seconds of the MATCH. VIOLATION: FOUL per LITTER. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
Good point. I forgot about the last 20 seconds.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
As did I xD
However getting a piece of litter into the landfill with 5 seconds remaining is slightly more legal. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
I believe that the strongest alliances will have two robots that can stack 6 totes tall. Of those two, one will get totes from the feeder station while the other collects from the field. The third robot will get as many recycling bins from the center as it can, fill them with litter, and then top off the already made stacks.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
Quote:
It's physically possible, but seems unlikely to me, and the failure modes are bad. I think bottom-stacking* is the only way we're likely to see max height stacks with bins on top. *EDIT: or stacking a stack-with-bin on top of a stack-without-bin. Last edited by BethMo : 15-01-2015 at 19:49. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
I'm pretty sure at this point that making it into eliminations will be done independent of alliance partners. The robots that have the highest average score (the "winners") will be those that can score totes and bins both, independently, and quickly. The winners of eliminations will be the team that gets the bins from the step the quickest.
This is a very challenging game. Well played, GDC. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
Kevin Sheridam is some troll trying to be like Kevin Sheridan.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
In reverse.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
That totally fooled me. Thanks for pointing that out.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
we have a mechanism that will securely grip a container in the last 4 inches and is not likely to let go.
We will see but the wooden prototype worked well, the aluminum one should work better. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stacking vs Capping vs ???
No one here is talking about a robot that can stack totes and deliver stacks to the scoring zone at the same time. The rules allow such a robot this year.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|