Go to Post Just remember to never take the "Us vs Them" mentality and you should come out all right. - Ian Curtis [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2015, 14:25
apm4242 apm4242 is offline
Registered User
FRC #4242
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 83
apm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud of
pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2015, 14:27
cadandcookies's Avatar
cadandcookies cadandcookies is offline
Director of Programs, GOFIRST
AKA: Nick Aarestad
FTC #9205 (The Iron Maidens)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 1,539
cadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

I really like the ramp idea. How much have you prototyped that/ how well does it work?
__________________

Never assume the motives of others are, to them, less noble than yours are to you. - John Perry Barlow
tumblr | twitter
'Snow Problem CAD Files: 2015 2016
MN FTC Field Manager, FTA, CSA, Emcee
FLL Maybe NXT Year (09-10) -> FRC 2220 (11-14) -> FTC 9205(14-?)/FRC 2667 (15-16)
VEXU UMN (2015-??)
Volunteer since 2011
2013 RCA Winner (North Star Regional) (2220)
2016 Connect Award Winner (North Super Regional and World Championship) (9205)
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2015, 14:40
faust1706's Avatar
faust1706 faust1706 is offline
Registered User
FRC #1706 (Ratchet Rockers)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: St Louis
Posts: 498
faust1706 is infamous around these partsfaust1706 is infamous around these parts
Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

Have you done a stress analysis of this yet? I don't know the material used, but looking at the design, the thought that when you try to lift a stack of totes, your elevator at the top might begin to bend depending on a few factors. I'm a programmer, though. Take this with a grain of salt.
__________________
"You're a gentleman," they used to say to him. "You shouldn't have gone murdering people with a hatchet; that's no occupation for a gentleman."
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2015, 14:49
Ty Tremblay's Avatar
Ty Tremblay Ty Tremblay is offline
Robotics Engineer
FRC #0319 (Big Bad Bob)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Alton NH
Posts: 827
Ty Tremblay has a reputation beyond reputeTy Tremblay has a reputation beyond reputeTy Tremblay has a reputation beyond reputeTy Tremblay has a reputation beyond reputeTy Tremblay has a reputation beyond reputeTy Tremblay has a reputation beyond reputeTy Tremblay has a reputation beyond reputeTy Tremblay has a reputation beyond reputeTy Tremblay has a reputation beyond reputeTy Tremblay has a reputation beyond reputeTy Tremblay has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

I'd suggest making your elevator car a little taller to space the carrier wheels out further. This will decrease the chances of having any sag in your manipulator when you have a full stack.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2015, 14:51
K-Dawg157's Avatar
K-Dawg157 K-Dawg157 is offline
Aspiring Engineer
FRC #0157 (Aztechs 157)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Marlborough
Posts: 78
K-Dawg157 has a spectacular aura aboutK-Dawg157 has a spectacular aura about
Talking Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by faust1706 View Post
Have you done a stress analysis of this yet? I don't know the material used, but looking at the design, the thought that when you try to lift a stack of totes, your elevator at the top might begin to bend depending on a few factors. I'm a programmer, though. Take this with a grain of salt.
You have a valid point, programmer.

It would all depend on the material being used, and the orientation it was being used in. Also, how high the support from the back is up the side rails would be important.

I did some calculations with an engineer, and we figured it out that the maximum load the robot (assuming 6 tote or 5 tote bucket and noodle capabilities) would be holding, cantilevered at 6' in the air, would be ~400 foot pounds...

Make sure your material is all good and the supports will hold it and you should be set.
__________________
"The Future is yours, should you choose to accept it"

"The future belongs to those who believe in their dreams"
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2015, 15:00
eddie12390's Avatar
eddie12390 eddie12390 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eddie
FRC #3260 (SHARP)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 285
eddie12390 is a glorious beacon of lighteddie12390 is a glorious beacon of lighteddie12390 is a glorious beacon of lighteddie12390 is a glorious beacon of lighteddie12390 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Dawg157 View Post
I did some calculations with an engineer, and we figured it out that the maximum load the robot (assuming 6 tote or 5 tote bucket and noodle capabilities) would be holding, cantilevered at 6' in the air, would be ~400 foot pounds...
Given the configuration of this robot, what does the CoG look like at that point? It seems like you'd have to have a fairly hefty counterbalance to keep it from faceplanting.
__________________
Any post that I make expresses only my opinions. I do not represent the opinions of my team or of any entity affiliated with my team.

As a Mentor:
2016 - Engineering Inspiration at Greater Pittsburgh Regional

As a Driver:
2014 - Winner of Greater Pittsburgh Regional
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2015, 15:12
faust1706's Avatar
faust1706 faust1706 is offline
Registered User
FRC #1706 (Ratchet Rockers)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: St Louis
Posts: 498
faust1706 is infamous around these partsfaust1706 is infamous around these parts
Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

That was really my only fear for robots this year as far as damage; could they handle the torque of picking up a stack of n totes + the bin and not get deformed over the course of the season?

Side note: I think demos of robots this year will actually be pretty cool if they can either lift a lot of weight, or stack autonomously, or both.

There is also the concern of center of gravity, as eddie12390 has pointed out.
I haven't been around frc long enough to see robots fall over because of game piece weight, if it has even ever happened.
__________________
"You're a gentleman," they used to say to him. "You shouldn't have gone murdering people with a hatchet; that's no occupation for a gentleman."
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2015, 15:23
Christopher149 Christopher149 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0857 (Superior Roboworks) FTC 10723 (SnowBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Houghton, MI
Posts: 1,100
Christopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by faust1706 View Post
There is also the concern of center of gravity, as eddie12390 has pointed out. I haven't been around frc long enough to see robots fall over because of game piece weight, if it has even ever happened.
My freshman year (2008), at least one robot fell over at the Wisconsin Regional (and IIRC, almost tried to fall out of the field). This was a combination of height and trackball weight.
__________________
2015-present: FTC 10723 mentor
2012-present: 857 mentor
2008-2011: 857 student

2015: Industrial Design, Excellence in Engineering, District Finalist, Archimedes Division (#6 alliance captain)
2014: Judges Award, District Engineering Inspiration, District Finalist, Galileo Division

Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2015, 16:19
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,221
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Dawg157 View Post
You have a valid point, programmer.

It would all depend on the material being used, and the orientation it was being used in. Also, how high the support from the back is up the side rails would be important.

I did some calculations with an engineer, and we figured it out that the maximum load the robot (assuming 6 tote or 5 tote bucket and noodle capabilities) would be holding, cantilevered at 6' in the air, would be ~400 foot pounds...

Make sure your material is all good and the supports will hold it and you should be set.
400ft lbs?
For totes cantalievered like 14" out from the front of the robot, I only get arounf 70ft-lbs for a 60lb load. I though you were only supposed to consider the X-distance, not the Y height for torque caused by gravity.
Could you please share your calculations?
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2015, 16:56
apm4242 apm4242 is offline
Registered User
FRC #4242
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 83
apm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud of
Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

Quote:
I really like the ramp idea. How much have you prototyped that/ how well does it work?
Thanks. To answer your question - not at all. It's on the to-do list. We have some .25" clear acrylic laying around and will try this soon. We may have to put a single driven wheel at the bottom corner of the ramp to prevent totes from leaning against us rather than sliding off at the end. The downside of the ramp idea is that if we're feeding totes to the field, we're not stacking...

Quote:
Other stability questions
The plan is to put hefty weights in the back. Probably around 25lbs, maybe more depending on testing. The material is aluminum t-slot. It should be fine but we'll probably move the support a bit higher. Either way, we don't plan to lift more than 3 totes or 2 totes/1 bin if hooked from the long edge OR 2 totes or 1 tote/1 bin if hooked from the short edge.

Thanks for all the replies!
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2015, 09:36
Orion.DeYoe Orion.DeYoe is offline
Registered User
FRC #5413 (Stellar Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: North Fairfield, OH
Posts: 205
Orion.DeYoe is a splendid one to beholdOrion.DeYoe is a splendid one to beholdOrion.DeYoe is a splendid one to beholdOrion.DeYoe is a splendid one to beholdOrion.DeYoe is a splendid one to beholdOrion.DeYoe is a splendid one to beholdOrion.DeYoe is a splendid one to beholdOrion.DeYoe is a splendid one to behold
Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Dawg157 View Post
You have a valid point, programmer.

It would all depend on the material being used, and the orientation it was being used in. Also, how high the support from the back is up the side rails would be important.

I did some calculations with an engineer, and we figured it out that the maximum load the robot (assuming 6 tote or 5 tote bucket and noodle capabilities) would be holding, cantilevered at 6' in the air, would be ~400 foot pounds...

Make sure your material is all good and the supports will hold it and you should be set.
Um... You need to check those numbers...
The load is not cantilevered the height of the elevator. The number you should be using for your moment arm is the horizontal distance from the center of the carriage to the COG of the load (something like 12-16 inches). Multiply that distance by the weight of the load (60 lbs we'll say) and you get something like 720 - 960 in*lbs (60 - 80 ft*lbs).
It appears everything is made from 1x1 8020 extrusion. It's pretty beefy stuff and the elevator appears well-supported. I wouldn't anticipate anything horrible happening to it.
I probably would make the carriage taller though (as someone else mentioned).
__________________
Thanks for your time,
Orion DeYoe

FRC Team 2252 "The Mavericks" 2011-2014 (Student)
FRC Team 5413 "Stellar Robotics" 2014-???? (Mentor)

2011: Drive Coach, CAD, Programming, Electrical
2012: Drive Coach, Team Captain, Team Representative, CAD, Programming, Electrical
2013: Drive Coach, Team Captain, Team Representative, CAD, Programming, Electrical
2014: Drive Coach, Strategy, CAD
2015: Team Founder, Design/CAD Mentor, Drive Coach
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2015, 11:39
K-Dawg157's Avatar
K-Dawg157 K-Dawg157 is offline
Aspiring Engineer
FRC #0157 (Aztechs 157)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Marlborough
Posts: 78
K-Dawg157 has a spectacular aura aboutK-Dawg157 has a spectacular aura about
Unhappy Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Dawg157 View Post
You have a valid point, programmer.

It would all depend on the material being used, and the orientation it was being used in. Also, how high the support from the back is up the side rails would be important.

I did some calculations with an engineer, and we figured it out that the maximum load the robot (assuming 6 tote or 5 tote, bucket and noodle capabilities) would be holding, cantilevered at 6' in the air, would be ~400 foot pounds...

Make sure your material is all good and the supports will hold it and you should be set.
EDIT:::

I have realized my mistake... I was assuming the wire would be pulling from the back of the robot, and the bottom tote would be at the top of the "pillars". I was calculating the wrong Moment of Inertia and wrong placement... I'll redo that.

Sorry for the confusion.
__________________
"The Future is yours, should you choose to accept it"

"The future belongs to those who believe in their dreams"
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2015, 12:12
RonnieS's Avatar
RonnieS RonnieS is offline
Just a tad washed up
AKA: Ronnie Sherrer
FRC #0314
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Flint/Warren
Posts: 389
RonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by apm4242 View Post
It looks like you will be running chain? Make sure you have a proper way to tension those giant runs. My vote would be to look at putting a tensioning device in the middle of your chain run. You will already be anchoring your carriage so doesn't seem to be too big of a deal, would even look at having it build into how it attaches to your carriage.

Second, I would put a cross support. Doesn't have to be directly on uppers but maybe on the angled back support braces.

Lastly, I love the ramp idea. I would look into seeing how you can stack them quick from the human loader station. Maybe by having a ramp with pistons on bottom that let one slide to floor then it raises up enough to clear first tote and slides the second tote right on top. I know our team will be looking for those robots that can make quick pre stacks.
-Ronnie
__________________
"Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience"
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2015, 14:52
apm4242 apm4242 is offline
Registered User
FRC #4242
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 83
apm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud of
Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronnie314 View Post
It looks like you will be running chain? Make sure you have a proper way to tension those giant runs. My vote would be to look at putting a tensioning device in the middle of your chain run. You will already be anchoring your carriage so doesn't seem to be too big of a deal, would even look at having it build into how it attaches to your carriage.

Second, I would put a cross support. Doesn't have to be directly on uppers but maybe on the angled back support braces.

Lastly, I love the ramp idea. I would look into seeing how you can stack them quick from the human loader station. Maybe by having a ramp with pistons on bottom that let one slide to floor then it raises up enough to clear first tote and slides the second tote right on top. I know our team will be looking for those robots that can make quick pre stacks.
-Ronnie
Ronnie - Thanks for the input! We have limited experience with chain driven devices. Given the rollers and the carriage track, I'm not sure where we could put a tensioner. However, we might be able to use something like McMaster's Extended-Life Adjustable
Roller Chain Tensioners
on our carriage to tenison it. One or both of the lift axles are going to be on adjustable flange bearings on the tslot. Do you think this will be sufficient to tension the chains?

RE the ramp - Right now, this ramp would only be able to make 1-stacks oriented in a consistent way for others to pick up (basically removing the inconsistencies of the chute). Although, one of our original designs was an articulating conveyor that would make quick 2 and 3-stacks from the tote chute but we nixed it because we didn't have a strong way to drive the cantilevered conveyor and grip was an issue.
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2015, 15:13
apm4242 apm4242 is offline
Registered User
FRC #4242
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 83
apm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud ofapm4242 has much to be proud of
Re: pic: 4242 Preliminary CAD 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by cadandcookies View Post
I really like the ramp idea. How much have you prototyped that/ how well does it work?
Prototyped it today. It works fairly well but does not slide without the help of the speed gained in the chute. That is to say, the tote did not slide when placed on the acrylic ramp at 16 degrees.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:39.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi