Go to Post Reading Andy Bakers post- priceless :D - thoughtful [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 8 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2015, 16:54
Mr_D_Mentor's Avatar
Mr_D_Mentor Mr_D_Mentor is offline
Registered User
AKA: Frank D'Anna
FRC #5856 (The Bullbots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 30
Mr_D_Mentor is on a distinguished road
Re: PROTRUSIONS QUESTION

How about small protrusions like bolt heads etc. that have been allowed in the past. I don't see the exception in the rules this year.

Unless I'm missing something, this means that if we use the kit frame then we have to cut the front and back rails about 1" smaller than 28" to get the axle bolt heads inside the envelope. (for narrow configuration).
__________________
-----------------------
8th year mentor
Bullbots, First Team #5856
The Nuts & Bolts of Fury, FIRST Team #3525
Team MAX, FIRST Team #1071
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2015, 17:05
Jon Stratis's Avatar
Jon Stratis Jon Stratis is online now
Mentor, LRI, MN RPC
FRC #2177 (The Robettes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,838
Jon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: PROTRUSIONS QUESTION

You are correct, there are no exemptions for bolt heads and the like this year.

As guidance, previously, when we had similar width/length limits for the robot those were absolute limits. The robot had to fit in a rigid sizing box, and a bolt sticking over could be enough to keep you out of the box. Back then, it was common guidance to build 1" under in every dimension to ensure you would fit in the box.

The question is, how will this be treated this year? Personally, I would err on the side of caution and build my robot a little undersized. That way you will be guaranteed not to have an issue. And if you do have a bolt head sticking out just a little too far? I find prayer and a chocolate covered gift to the inspector* does wonders


*bribes don't actually work. I would personally accept the chocolate, eat it, then send Al over to perform the inspection
__________________
2007 - Present: Mentor, 2177 The Robettes
LRI: North Star 2012-2016; Lake Superior 2013-2014; MN State Tournament 2013-2014, 2016; Galileo 2016; Iowa 2017
2015: North Star Regional Volunteer of the Year
2016: Lake Superior WFFA
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2015, 21:29
magnets's Avatar
magnets magnets is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 748
magnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond reputemagnets has a reputation beyond repute
Re: PROTRUSIONS QUESTION

I predict there will be many teams who show up with a kitbot with the bolt heads sticking out this year. FIRST may want to consider a blog post/Update that covers this issue, as I know I'd be really sad if I were a rookie team having to cut up my robot when I got to the competition.
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2015, 21:34
DonRotolo's Avatar
DonRotolo DonRotolo is offline
Back to humble
FRC #0832
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 7,025
DonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: PROTRUSIONS QUESTION

Quote:
Originally Posted by magnets View Post
I predict there will be many teams who show up with a kitbot with the bolt heads sticking out this year. FIRST may want to consider a blog post/Update that covers this issue, as I know I'd be really sad if I were a rookie team having to cut up my robot when I got to the competition.
Perhaps having to do that will teach them to read the rules next time, eh? Hard lesson, but effective.

As Jon stated (as per Q&A) there are not exceptions for bolt heads and the like.

My advice to teams is to build to 27 x 41 x 77. Will an extra inch really make the robot work any better??
__________________

I am N2IRZ - What's your callsign?
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2015, 22:03
gpetilli gpetilli is offline
Registered User
FRC #1559
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Victor, NY
Posts: 286
gpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to allgpetilli is a name known to all
Re: PROTRUSIONS QUESTION

Please keep in mind that the transport dimensions are absolute - unlike recent years which were a somewhat subjective perimeter. The allowance for bolt heads has specifically been ruled out (they do count towards the size limit). In the years before the switch to a perimeter rule, they had an inspection box that the robot had to fit in - bolts and all. It was an unbiased pass/fail test. I have seen teams grinding welds and replacing bolts with rivets to get that last 0.1 inch off so that they fit into the box.

Please design your robot to be at least 0.5in smaller than the transport limits to allow for tolerance of assembly and the inspection box.
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2015, 23:59
dtengineering's Avatar
dtengineering dtengineering is offline
Teaching Teachers to Teach Tech
AKA: Jason Brett
no team (British Columbia FRC teams)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,833
dtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond repute
Re: PROTRUSIONS QUESTION

I'd encourage FIRST to consider a scaled up version of the laser sizing box I built for use at our VEX tournaments.

It is brutally effective... and quick. http://www.vexforum.com/showthread.p...t=laser+sizing

But more likely there will be a more traditional sizing box.

Jason
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2015, 00:12
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,526
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: PROTRUSIONS QUESTION

Quote:
Originally Posted by dtengineering View Post
I'd encourage FIRST to consider a scaled up version of the laser sizing box I built for use at our VEX tournaments.

It is brutally effective... and quick. http://www.vexforum.com/showthread.p...t=laser+sizing

But more likely there will be a more traditional sizing box.

Jason
When I read "laser sizing box", I imagined a machine that uses lasers to shave off any offending bits of the robot.
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2015, 02:09
Mr V's Avatar
Mr V Mr V is offline
FIRST Senior Mentor Washington
FRC #5588 (Reign)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Maple Valley Wa
Posts: 997
Mr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond reputeMr V has a reputation beyond repute
Re: PROTRUSIONS QUESTION

Quote:
Originally Posted by dtengineering View Post
I'd encourage FIRST to consider a scaled up version of the laser sizing box I built for use at our VEX tournaments.

It is brutally effective... and quick. http://www.vexforum.com/showthread.p...t=laser+sizing

But more likely there will be a more traditional sizing box.

Jason
The current official ruling on how the footprint portion of the sizing will be checked is with a tape outline on the floor. The height will be checked with a tape measure. I can see a plumb bob being used in the case of robots that are in a "mushroom" shape in the transport configuration.
__________________
All statements made on Chief Delphi by me are my own opinions and are not official FIRST rulings or opinions and should not be construed as such.




https://www.facebook.com/pages/Team-...77508782410839
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2015, 02:18
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #1072 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,232
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: PROTRUSIONS QUESTION

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonRotolo View Post
Perhaps having to do that will teach them to read the rules next time, eh? Hard lesson, but effective.

As Jon stated (as per Q&A) there are not exceptions for bolt heads and the like.

My advice to teams is to build to 27 x 41 x 77. Will an extra inch really make the robot work any better??
You would be surprised how much an extra inch would have helped us this year. One more inch would have made a pretty drastic change in our robot.
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2015, 06:04
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,764
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: PROTRUSIONS QUESTION

Quote:
Originally Posted by magnets View Post
I predict there will be many teams who show up with a kitbot with the bolt heads sticking out this year. FIRST may want to consider a blog post/Update that covers this issue, as I know I'd be really sad if I were a rookie team having to cut up my robot when I got to the competition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonRotolo View Post
Perhaps having to do that will teach them to read the rules next time, eh? Hard lesson, but effective.

As Jon stated (as per Q&A) there are not exceptions for bolt heads and the like.
The first year of the frame perimeter rule, a team showed up with a 38x28 robot. They couldn't compete, because they couldn't reconfigure it within the timeframe of the competition.

To the team's credit, when it was determined hopeless, they helped other teams with lesser problems.
__________________
(since 2004)
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2015, 07:36
Jon Stratis's Avatar
Jon Stratis Jon Stratis is online now
Mentor, LRI, MN RPC
FRC #2177 (The Robettes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,838
Jon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: PROTRUSIONS QUESTION

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryVoshol View Post
The first year of the frame perimeter rule, a team showed up with a 38x28 robot. They couldn't compete, because they couldn't reconfigure it within the timeframe of the competition.

To the team's credit, when it was determined hopeless, they helped other teams with lesser problems.
I had two of those, one at each of the events I was LRI. Was caught them quick, have them dedicated inspector help, and managed to get them in the field that weekend. It was very tough, and they did little more than drive around, but it was a valuable learning experience for them!
__________________
2007 - Present: Mentor, 2177 The Robettes
LRI: North Star 2012-2016; Lake Superior 2013-2014; MN State Tournament 2013-2014, 2016; Galileo 2016; Iowa 2017
2015: North Star Regional Volunteer of the Year
2016: Lake Superior WFFA
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2015, 11:03
kmusa kmusa is offline
Registered User
AKA: Karlis Musa
FRC #0639 (Code Red Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 117
kmusa is just really nicekmusa is just really nicekmusa is just really nicekmusa is just really nice
Re: PROTRUSIONS QUESTION

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
There are no game rules specifying max length or width while the robot is on the field.
Except for G7-C:
Quote:
When placed on the FIELD for a MATCH, each ROBOT must be completely outside of their AUTO ZONE and LANDFILL ZONE.
__________________
"A society without contrasting ideas will never move forward; however those contrasting ideas must be based on fact, must be rational/logical, and must be presented in a respectful manner." -Arthur Dutra IV

"If the district can spend $1.5M on turf, it should be able to fund a FRC team." -Sophie Halter
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2015, 11:07
kmusa kmusa is offline
Registered User
AKA: Karlis Musa
FRC #0639 (Code Red Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 117
kmusa is just really nicekmusa is just really nicekmusa is just really nicekmusa is just really nice
Re: PROTRUSIONS QUESTION

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
I find prayer and a chocolate covered gift to the inspector* does wonders


*bribes don't actually work. I would personally accept the chocolate, eat it, then send Al over to perform the inspection
So how does Al feel about chocolate?
__________________
"A society without contrasting ideas will never move forward; however those contrasting ideas must be based on fact, must be rational/logical, and must be presented in a respectful manner." -Arthur Dutra IV

"If the district can spend $1.5M on turf, it should be able to fund a FRC team." -Sophie Halter
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:37.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi