Go to Post Because FIRST wants everyone to have a sense of accomplishment even if you didn't accomplish anything during the match. - Koko Ed [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 12 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2015, 14:12
lukedude43 lukedude43 is offline
Doer of stuff and things
AKA: Luke Reinert
FRC #4030 (NullPointerException)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 50
lukedude43 will become famous soon enoughlukedude43 will become famous soon enough
Re: pic: 6 week swerve

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesCH95 View Post
Good.

However, the principle of limiting power-train speed in code, typically done via limiting the maximum voltage from each motor controller, is very bad. This artificially cripples the drive train, which is likely the most important sub-system on your robot. You might consider using chain, belts, or another lower-profile means of getting the gear reduction you should have inside of the envelope you're limited to.
I understand that it isn't a perfect idea, but what it does allow us to do is get 4 modules made and starting testing on 4 modules. If we want to change the top gear reduction to something that will give us a more reasonable top speed we can go back and change the belt reduction to #25 chain. We'd have to redo the actual gearbox plates but those are relatively cheap. 4 module testing will be the make it or break it for the swerve so I see continuing on and limiting motor speed in code to be the best option.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2015, 14:24
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,097
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 6 week swerve

Quote:
Originally Posted by lukedude43 View Post
what it does allow us to do is get 4 modules made and starting testing on 4 modules
Just to be clear: The point James was making is that your testing will not be representative of the fine control you could get by reducing the speed via gearing.


Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2015, 15:30
JamesCH95's Avatar
JamesCH95 JamesCH95 is offline
Hardcore Dork
AKA: JCH
FRC #0095 (The Grasshoppers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Enfield, NH
Posts: 1,849
JamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 6 week swerve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
Just to be clear: The point James was making is that your testing will not be representative of the fine control you could get by reducing the speed via gearing.


Yup.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lukedude43 View Post
Will come back and edit so this makes sense

Realized I forgot to add other important info but the gist of it is 3d printed preliminary pods and having the gears for this gearing change in shop
I can appreciate that you have a hard deadline and you want to prove the drive works before then.

However, consider this: you can make the gearing change, the drive is sluggish and does not perform well when you demo it, but by gosh it never gets hung up on the ramp (which is the whole reason to change gearing, right?) Or, you can leave in a more robust gear ratio, and show that the drive accelerates well, is very controllable, and behaves nicely; and though the gears might contact the playing field under certain rare circumstances, you can solve that problem by making any of the changes mentioned in this thread.

If you're going to argue for swerve drive, which of those situations gives you a firmer position to argue from?

Edit: In the spirit of full disclosure, my team is setting up a chassis with a free speed of around 14 ft/s. We made this decision based upon easily available gear ratios, easily available wheels, and ability to neatly integrate it into our chassis. We are, however, planning on using 4 CIMs and 4 mini-CIMs, which will help offset the losses in acceleration and low-speed control at the expense of weight.
__________________
Theory is a nice place, I'd like to go there one day, I hear everything works there.

Maturity is knowing you were an idiot, common sense is trying to not be an idiot, wisdom is knowing that you will still be an idiot.

Last edited by JamesCH95 : 22-01-2015 at 15:42.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2015, 16:17
Ken Streeter's Avatar
Ken Streeter Ken Streeter is offline
Let the MAYHEM begin!
FRC #1519 (Mechanical Mayhem)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Team: Milford, NH; Me: Bedford, NH
Posts: 471
Ken Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeKen Streeter has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 6 week swerve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
Just to be clear: The point James was making is that your testing will not be representative of the fine control you could get by reducing the speed via gearing.
Fine control through appropriate reduction gearing is a huge benefit. In past years, this has been a big reason we have used a 2-speed robot. Typically, people focus on "low gear" for pushing power, but a "low gear" is awesome for fine-control situations.

In 2012 we optimized the drive base design for bridge balancing. We knew we needed very fine control and designed the drive base around that. Teams all year wondered how our driver could balance with nearly any other robot so quickly and efficiently. The real key was the fine control of the drive base. If our driver wanted to move the robot forward a half-inch to finish the balance, she could easily do that - no problem. Our gearing in low gear that year was 2.35fps (after efficiency losses). The real benefit of the low gearing wasn't the power in low gear (although that didn't hurt) but was the fine control for bridge balancing.

Does stacking totes seem like a high-precision task?
__________________
Ken Streeter - Team 1519 - Mechanical Mayhem (Milford Area Youth Homeschoolers Enriching Minds)
2015 NE District Winners with 195 & 2067, 125 & 1786, 230 & 4908, and 95 & 1307
2013 World Finalists & Archimedes Division Winners with 33 & 469
2013 & 2012 North Carolina Regional Winners with teams 435 & 4828 and 1311 & 2642
2011, 2010, 2006 Granite State Regional Winners with teams 175 & 176, 1073 & 1058, and 1276 & 133
Team 1519 Video Gallery - including Chairman's Video, and the infamous "Speed Racer!"
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2015, 16:55
lukedude43 lukedude43 is offline
Doer of stuff and things
AKA: Luke Reinert
FRC #4030 (NullPointerException)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 50
lukedude43 will become famous soon enoughlukedude43 will become famous soon enough
Re: pic: 6 week swerve

I'm back on a computer and actually have some time so hopefully I can write a response that will make me seem less willfully ignorant

First of, the change in gearing is an admittedly quick and dirty fix, but what I believe to be the best fix just to get some pods printed up and working together. We are 3d printing the first iteration of the pods in the next few nights so that we can have something together and working so our programmer has the maximum amount of time to work on getting the pods working together nicely and field oriented control working nicely. The gearing change is by no means a final fix which is something I something I don't think I ever mentioned (serious mistake on my part), it is just a quick fix to get the test bed together and running.

What i'm leaning towards as a final fix is a cim face mounted to the lower plate with a cim gear going to a gear on some .5 hex shaft. That shaft will have the pulley that was previously on the cim with the same gear reduction. If I do this right that means the wheel pod reduction could actually end up being something like 50:30 (as opposed to the previous 30:50) which should leave more than enough ramp clearance for the wheel gear.

The testing we're going to do tonight is only to see if last years robot (roughly 15 fps) with motor speed limited will give us fine enough control for our collector (In my mind our robot design is split into collector and indexer, collector is the only part that needs fine control). If it is it leaves the current quick and dirty gear change fix as a semi viable option if for some reason everything goes to crap. All of the downsides (motor speed being limited as opposed to proper gearing, barely scraping by on ramp clearance, etc.) will all be taken into account in the final decision matrix that decides if our swerve is actually worth it or if we should throw in the tank drive.
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2015, 04:12
lukedude43 lukedude43 is offline
Doer of stuff and things
AKA: Luke Reinert
FRC #4030 (NullPointerException)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 50
lukedude43 will become famous soon enoughlukedude43 will become famous soon enough
Re: pic: 6 week swerve

updates http://imgur.com/a/MYNGL
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi