|
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Feedback
The blog first states,
"In order to provide teams with feedback that is effective and most useful, we will offer the following ways teams can get feedback for the 2015 season…"
They then go on to only list one clear way to get any sort of feedback, and that's by having a mentor observe the presentation. This is something not many teams will probably do, considering the mentor would have to take the place of one of the three presenters. Even then, the mentor's feedback will most likely not help the team majorly improve their chances of winning Chairman's in the future, since they [the mentor] don't know what the judges are specifically looking for in teams.
Since they only gave one, poorly elaborated upon reason as to why they removed the feedback forms, does anyone have any potential other reasons? This just seems like a largely unfavorable change.
__________________
2016|100-16-1|4 banners|4 medals (Galileo winners/Einstein semifinalists)
2015|??-??-??|5 banners|7 medals (CMP Engineering Inspiration winners/Newton finalists)
2014|73-36-0|2 banners|2 medals
2013|50-19-0|1 banner|1 medal
"Was wir für uns selbst tun, stirbt mit uns. Was wir für andere tun, verbleibt und ist unsterblich."
|
Communication is what keeps a good team on track. - CMBrandon [more] 
22-01-2015, 16:20
Threaded Mode