Go to Post it's shadows and fog and stormy skies and a reminder that things are rarely black and white but instead, the places in between. - MissInformation [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Programming > Java
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2015, 11:58
FrankJ's Avatar
FrankJ FrankJ is offline
Robot Mentor
FRC #2974 (WALT)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 1,942
FrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Programming for money

I am not sure how selling programing time is any different than selling extrusions or a swerve drive module.

Of course as other have said, it becomes a COTs item and needs to meet all the COTs item rules. Including it needs to be an established company & ready to meet reasonable demands of all team? If the team modifies the code it then becomes a modified part. Not legal for next year's robot?
__________________
If you don't know what you should hook up then you should read a data sheet
Reply With Quote
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2015, 12:02
notmattlythgoe's Avatar
notmattlythgoe notmattlythgoe is offline
Flywheel Police
AKA: Matthew Lythgoe
FRC #2363 (Triple Helix)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,728
notmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond reputenotmattlythgoe has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Programming for money

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankJ View Post
I am not sure how selling programing time is any different than selling extrusions or a swerve drive module.

Of course as other have said, it becomes a COTs item and needs to meet all the COTs item rules. Including it needs to be an established company & ready to meet reasonable demands of all team? If the team modifies the code it then becomes a modified part. Not legal for next year's robot?
How would this be any different than example 6? I could even argue that it doesn't even need to be included in the BOM. It's just 2 teams making donations to each other.

Quote:
R11 The BOM cost of each non-KOP item must be calculated based on the unit fair market value for the material and/or labor, except for labor provided by Team members (including sponsor employees who are members of the team), members of other Teams, event provided Machine Shops and shipping.

EXAMPLE 1: A Team orders a custom bracket made by a company to the Team’s specification. The company’s material cost and normally charged labor rate apply.
EXAMPLE 2: A Team receives a donated sensor. The company would normally sell this item for $52 USD, which is therefore its fair market value.
EXAMPLE 3: Special price discounts from National Instruments and other FRC Suppliers are being offered to all FIRST Teams. The discounted purchase price of items from these sources may be used in the additional parts accounting calculations.
EXAMPLE 4: A Team purchases steel bar stock for $10 USD and has it machined by a local machine shop. The machine shop is not considered a team Sponsor, but donates two (2) hours of expended labor anyway. The Team must include the estimated normal cost of the labor as if it were paid to the machine shop, and add it to the $10 USD.
EXAMPLE 5: A Team purchases steel bar stock for $10 USD and has it machined by a local machine shop that is a recognized Sponsor of the Team. If the machinists are considered members of the Team, their labor costs do not apply. The total applicable cost for the part would be $10 USD.

It is in the best interests of the Teams and FIRST to form relationships with as many organizations as possible. Teams are encouraged to
be expansive in recruiting and including organizations in their team, as that exposes more people and organizations to FIRST. Recognizing
supporting companies as Sponsors of, and members in, the Team is encouraged, even if the involvement of the Sponsor is solely through the
donation of fabrication labor.

EXAMPLE 6: A Team purchases steel bar stock for $10 USD and has it machined by another Team. The total applicable cost for the part
would be $10 USD.

EXAMPLE 7: A Team purchases a 4 by 4 ft sheet of aluminum, but only uses a piece 10 by 10 in. on their ROBOT. The Team identifies a source that sells aluminum sheet in 1 by 1 ft pieces. The Team may cost their part on the basis of a 1 by 1 ft piece, even though they cut the piece from a larger bulk purchase. They do not have to account for the entire 4 by 4 ft bulk purchase item.

Last edited by notmattlythgoe : 04-02-2015 at 12:06.
Reply With Quote
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2015, 12:05
nickmcski nickmcski is offline
Registered User
AKA: Nicholas McCurry
FRC #1482 (Grandin Ghosts)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 112
nickmcski has a spectacular aura aboutnickmcski has a spectacular aura aboutnickmcski has a spectacular aura about
Re: Programming for money

I don't this this need to go in the way of whether of not its gp, I know if a team needed help programming their robot or couldn't get their code working I would be more than willing to get their code working free of charge. And i'm sure I know a lot of other people would be willing to help each other out. I just think there are a lot of people that would be willing to do the same thing free of charge.
Reply With Quote
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2015, 12:54
FrankJ's Avatar
FrankJ FrankJ is offline
Robot Mentor
FRC #2974 (WALT)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 1,942
FrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Programming for money

Quote:
Originally Posted by notmattlythgoe View Post
How would this be any different than example 6? I could even argue that it doesn't even need to be included in the BOM. It's just 2 teams making donations to each other.
The difference is the other Team is not donating time, they are charging for it.

On the other hand a literal reading of R11 doesn't address if the time is donated or paid for so maybe you are right. Only the GDC for future games knows for sure.
__________________
If you don't know what you should hook up then you should read a data sheet
Reply With Quote
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2015, 13:00
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is online now
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,710
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Programming for money

IMO, it's a troll looking to poke at a larger subject which may actually have longer-term ramifications. I think the applicable rule which allows this is <R11>, as outlined in Example 1:
Quote:
Originally Posted by <R11> Example 1
The company’s material cost and normally charged labor rate apply
FIRST would have a very hard time governing this. Paying for software development is a very tricky game in and of itself. What if the client isn't happy? Sure they'll get negative rep. but there goes a team's season. What if the client keeps changing what they want and therefore will never be happy? The programmer may not even get paid. What if such-and-such breaches the contract and now the team's school is being sued - is FIRST liable - parents are very litigation-happy, after all.

Even if a team can navigate that, the considerations do not stop there. Professional consultants with 10 years of documented positive testimonials can easily get $75-$100/hr for a high-value client. College students who've worked closed problems for 4 years, more like $16-$21/hr (pretty typical for an internship). FIRST alumni who did FRC programming for 4 years could probably net more than $16/hr due to the specialty, but how much more given the total cap on robot expenditures? What regional ramifications are there for programmer pay - a programmer who's worth $100/hr in San Fransisco isn't worth half that in rural Georgia simply due to cost of living adjustments, yet each must live within the $4k robot cost.

GP in this context is irrelevant. The client & consultant aren't competing with each other, nor is there necessarily a public disclosure of the details of an arrangement. It's a non-traditional and perhaps therefore frowned-upon" practice. Yet for hungry college kids who aren't looking to swindle a team, it could be a highly mutually beneficial experience.

A curious question IMO, is whether or not it's GP for Team A to enact a non-compete agreement with a programmer so the programmer doesn't help Team B who's 10 minutes down the road.

Edit - totally missed that this is a team being paid for another team's services. If there are governing entities involved (like school districts) add another layer of bureaucracy, yet otherwise the same issues apply. Otherwise the Team performing the services becomes the "company" in <R11>.

Last edited by JesseK : 04-02-2015 at 13:13.
Reply With Quote
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-02-2015, 06:45
matthewdenny's Avatar
matthewdenny matthewdenny is offline
Registered User
FRC #6054 (Dukes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 311
matthewdenny has a brilliant futurematthewdenny has a brilliant futurematthewdenny has a brilliant futurematthewdenny has a brilliant futurematthewdenny has a brilliant futurematthewdenny has a brilliant futurematthewdenny has a brilliant futurematthewdenny has a brilliant futurematthewdenny has a brilliant futurematthewdenny has a brilliant futurematthewdenny has a brilliant future
My first instinct is that this seems counter to the spirit of the competition. In retrospect go though I don't see how this is materially different from a team outsourcing the manufacturing of physical rebook parts to a company. It is quite possible that there are teams that are interested primarily in the building and not programming of a robot. for those teams they can still learn quite a bit from just the actual manufacturing of the machine minus the programming and still be inspired, perhaps even more so if programming has been your Achilles' heel in the past.
Reply With Quote
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-02-2015, 01:15
cstelter cstelter is offline
Programming Mentor
AKA: Craig Stelter
FRC #3018 (Nordic Storm)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Mankato, MN
Posts: 77
cstelter will become famous soon enough
Re: Programming for money

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewdenny View Post
My first instinct is that this seems counter to the spirit of the competition. In retrospect go though I don't see how this is materially different from a team outsourcing the manufacturing of physical rebook parts to a company. It is quite possible that there are teams that are interested primarily in the building and not programming of a robot. for those teams they can still learn quite a bit from just the actual manufacturing of the machine minus the programming and still be inspired, perhaps even more so if programming has been your Achilles' heel in the past.
So by equivalency could a team interested in programming ask a hardware design group to design them a robot to meet the challenge and receive a parts list and cad drawings? Then assemble the robot per spec so that they can program it?

In my mind, it's one thing to design a cad drawing and then have it laser cut or fabricated-- it was your design. It's another to farm out the actual design work.

How would this conversation go over at St. Louis?

FRC kid 1: Wow! That's an exciting autonomous you have there-- you carry all 3 containers and a stack of totes to the center *every* time!
FRC kid 2: Yeah-- we paid a firm to write that for us-- it was well worth it! We were clueless how to even start but they said if we added encoders here, and there and switches here and there that they could make it work so that's what we did!
Reply With Quote
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-02-2015, 01:43
GeeTwo's Avatar
GeeTwo GeeTwo is online now
Technical Director
AKA: Gus Michel II
FRC #3946 (Tiger Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 3,687
GeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Programming for money

When most teams send a part or system out for custom manufacture, it's mostly because they do not have the necessary equipment (lathe, CNC, laser cutter, mill, welder). To get good results, they have to figure out just what the piece should be so that it can do the job. The bottom line is that the team solved the problem, and the "contractor" implemented it. This is considered normal in FRC, though some teams can obviously afford a lot more of it than others.

Programming the robot is something that every team should have the equipment to do. There's enough stuff in the rookie KOP, and updates in each year's veterans' KOP. There is every expectation that even a minimally funded team could learn to program a robot. As such, this is something we really shouldn't see.

If a team turned over a physical robot to a programming "contractor" with a "make it score points" direction, that would definitely not be within the intent of FRC. However, if the the "client" team defines what the program must do (e.g. when limit switch A is engaged, motor B is only allowed to be stopped or in reverse), then I can certainly see the argument that the team has "solved" the problem and the "contractor" has implemented it.
__________________

If you can't find time to do it right, how are you going to find time to do it over?
If you don't pass it on, it never happened.
Robots are great, but inspiration is the reason we're here.
Friends don't let friends use master links.
Reply With Quote
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-02-2015, 02:02
Fauge7 Fauge7 is offline
Head programmer
FRC #3019 (firebird robotics)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 195
Fauge7 is a name known to allFauge7 is a name known to allFauge7 is a name known to allFauge7 is a name known to allFauge7 is a name known to allFauge7 is a name known to all
Re: Programming for money

If this person really needed money he would post more detail explaining how he can help teams. They would also post about how much experience they have coding robots.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:17.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi