|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 1678's 4 RC Autonomous
Gravity, your alliance partners, yourself, the A/C in the venue...
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great Measures
All I have to say is that our team went to great measures to make this work.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Great Measures
Quote:
I hope you have a version that goes for one or two containers, and I hope you have a strong drive train. (Also, good luck ending with a 4 container autonomous and not a 4 lid one!) |
|
#4
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Great Measures
You know the lids are zip tied shut, right?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Great Measures
I think this is a likely scenario, if one robot grabs high and another goes low. I would say that zip ties would break before robots let go, which leads to an interesting rules question: Can you score a can without the lid?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Great Measures
In your scenario above, I believe that one robot will be laying on the step.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Great Measures
#punny
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 1678's 4 RC Autonomous
Quote:
and 148, 1678... (I know you said alliance partners, I just wanted to emphasize that it's necessarily by accident). Echoing Adam, "If you can't use bins that are knocked over, it's [EDIT: high past] time to reassess your design." |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 1678's 4 RC Autonomous
I should also be added that if your robot is designed to handle the recycling cans., and you can't handle a knocked over bin, it's time to reasaess your design.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|