|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
Indiana FIRST was trying to include Illinois and Ohio when starting the District planning process a few years ago. I would expect that option to still be on the table. And I personally would be extremely happy to be able to call an Illinois/Indiana/Ohio (and maybe Kentucky) collection the "Cardinal" region.
Nobody's going to stop you from attending as a volunteer, right? |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
I will be quite upset if Iowa gets left out of all of the future regional systems in our neighboring states. Why is distance a different issue with districts? We have to travel to events anyway, so we can travel to out of state district events instead of out of state regional events.
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
Quote:
I like this model, last year we played 62 matches in 2 districts, PNW Championship and worlds. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
Quote:
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
This is how the scoring goes.
2 Districts > 1 Regional Championship > Worlds 2014- 153 teams in districts 64 Regional Championship 24 to Worlds ( this has moved up to 32) To see how the scoring goes : http://www.usfirst.org/sites/default... 0Summary.pdf I like the system, lots of playing and very good teams move on. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
Quote:
And for us, it's over an hour less driving to go to Duluth than Milwaukee. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
My hope is teams in sparsely populated states (teams/events wise) or teams teams in states who in the regional model typically competed out of state for their home events, will have the ability to choose and declare which region they will belong to based on what is best for them. This is of course if future developments on inter district play doesn't solve the issue to begin with (which I hope they do).
Basically though, this would implement the idea NE FIRST had proposed in the planning phases of the conversion in regards to the NY Tech Valley. You can read more about it here: http://www.nefirst.org/2012/10/24/inter-district-2/ |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
Quote:
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
Quote:
This is what typically comes up in "Districts?" threads anyway. I am not in a sparsely populated area, so I am no claim that this is actually the case. We generally feel like districts are a better 'shot' at qualifying for Worlds, not in terms of percentages or input energy, but because better/longer measures of consistency mean less luck and more team control. We've also found that districts are great for recruitment and retention, simply because you far play more and with the same group of teams. (My students are much, much more likely to have more friends on more teams than they were pre-districts.) There's also an interim goal/awesome experience to aim for besides the difficulty of qualifying for worlds. That said, many MAR teams also benefit in recruiting by having more 'home' (close) events. This is not a benefit less densely populated areas would see, though I don't know what affect, if any, that would have. To be clear, I'm just trying to answer this particular question, not suggest that anyone should cut Iowa out of districts. Personally I'd like to see a huge free-for-all where you just register for 2 Districts anywhere in the world, and choose your preferred District Championship. |
|
#27
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The teams in Iowa may find it best to align with Minnesota for a district system for example. |
|
#28
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
Quote:
(Most of) Ohio FRC has a more natural connection with parts east, traditionally. I firmly believe that is the direction in which we are headed. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
Case in point: Rochester and buffalo area teams have treated Cleveland and Pittsburgh as second regionals for as long as I remember, even with the addition of tech valley. The only other close option for us is Toronto, and most teams don't go there because of the difficulty of transporting a robot and team of people across an international border.
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ohio going to Districts?
Here in Cincy - we are closer to most of the Indiana events than NE Ohio or Western PA, but will be extremely happy to compete as much as possible in any district or regional events - east or west, north or south! We really enjoy spending time with all of our FIRST friends in all parts of the world!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|