|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you think will be the average score that gets a team a number one seed? | |||
| 10 |
|
3 | 0.93% |
| 20 |
|
1 | 0.31% |
| 30 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 40 |
|
3 | 0.93% |
| 50 |
|
7 | 2.16% |
| 60 |
|
32 | 9.88% |
| 70 |
|
32 | 9.88% |
| 80 |
|
50 | 15.43% |
| 90 |
|
27 | 8.33% |
| 100 |
|
54 | 16.67% |
| 110 |
|
31 | 9.57% |
| 120 |
|
35 | 10.80% |
| 130 |
|
16 | 4.94% |
| 140 |
|
3 | 0.93% |
| More than 140 |
|
30 | 9.26% |
| Voters: 324. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 1 Number One Seed Score Average
I'm pretty sure that there are more quality machines being built today than there were, say, five years ago. Credit that to increasing participation in and awareness of CD, Ri3D videos, and fantastic bumps in quality from AndyMark, Vex, and other suppliers. I think people are still overestimating the scoring ability of robots (usually their own), and that #1 seed scores will be <100, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were two or three or more robots that can pull off the three tote auto at each regional.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|