|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
Quote:
![]() |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
1114's Day 1 performance was so dominant, that if their alliance scored no points for the rest of qualifications, the second seed would still need around 200 points in their remaining 3 games to overtake them.
1114 = 141.5 * 8 = 1132* 2609 = 76.28 * 7 = 534* That's terrifyingly impressive. I wonder what their elimination/selection strategy will be. *There seems to be disparity between adding up all the columns (auto/container/coop/tote/litter) and the QA. Not sure why, but the QA is more accurate. Is there double-counting somewhere? |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
Fouls don't have a column, and are the one thing left.
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
anyone know if and where there is a live stream for ne district pioneer valley?
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
Of course! Can't believe I forgot about that. Cheers.
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
Quote:
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
Quote:
Springfield Pioneer Valley Event District (3/6-3/7) - Blue Stream http://www.twitch.tv/nefirst_blue North Shore Reading Event District (3/7-3/8) - Red Stream http://www.twitch.tv/nefirst_red |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
Quote:
1114's average score: 142.90 3130, 525, 4215 average score: 138.43 118, 624, 2613 average score: 137.75 148, 987, 3802 average score: 130.13 4488, 2550, 2093 average score: 105.29 33, 1024, 4768 Average score: 91.14 |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
Quote:
What I do like a lot about 1114 is the fact they can process via LF faster than any HP bot which is what I have been saying all along don't give up on LF their are more totes there easily accessible. Not slowed by tote chute door. I think theirs is the best overall design hands down (1st two weeks) due to word class LF processing speed...with a single non-tethered bot. They typically match with a single bot what 148+987 (three bots with Human help) do. If 1114 gets matched with the fastest RC wall grabber the WC is in the bag... I don't care what the third robot does unless they are the fastest RC+Noodle topper...alleviating slower the RC 1st step in building the stack of 1114 (26 seconds shave off 8-10) There is no question in my mind they can be the best by design and not neglecting the plentiful LF. Last edited by Boltman : 07-03-2015 at 11:32. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
Quote:
|
|
#27
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
Totally savage match just happened in Arkansas, Roboteers and Pwnage looking terrifying.
Edit: Metool also looking scary, can't leave them out. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
Quote:
2481/2451 are on fire. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
Here's some fun numbers out of Canada
Alliance 1 Captain 1114: 142.9 Alliance 2 188+4001: 142.7 Alliance 3 4946+3360: 142.5 Alliance 4 1310+2609: 134.8 giggity This game doesn't necessarily scale like you think it should. Certain strategies in the game right now (at least at GTRC) are stupid if you try them, while in 7 weeks it's stupid if you don't. As far as I know, 1114 has not run a co-op stack themselves in any match even though they generate an auto tote stack. I assume the POV they take is because of the disparate quality of them vs. the field means for every time they run a Co-Op stack they artificially inflate the scores of the other 5 teams on the alliance, with their partners to a lesser extent. Some events even a robot like 1114 might be better off with having co-op run than not, but right now they are beating the median QA at GTRC within the first minute of the match. Also even with the 610 pick by 1114, they probably don't even need step cans here. None of their opponent combos are breaking the 150 point barrier, which is a somewhat arbitrary benchmark I establish for an elim score you can achieve without step cans. I'm not including third robots just because if anything third robots at a pretty shallow event like GTRC could be impeding scores even in the 4, 5, and 6 alliances. 1547 might only see the field so 1114 doesn't have to tether to their ramp. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 2 Live Discussion
Is it just me, or are teams seeming to go for (and complete) the coopertition stacks less and less often? If so, why the big change from week 1 to 2?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|