|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Miscellaneous Statistics, just for fun
Interesting that the RC rank did not correlate very well with overall Qual rank. In the PNW, the RC consistently has a high correlation to Qual rank (and so does tote scores, but not litter or auto).
And I like your pairing of "random" and "stats". You would hope they would be mutually exclusive. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Miscellaneous Statistics, just for fun
Actually, the field of statistics was developed to cope with random processes; why not try it the other way once in a while?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Miscellaneous Statistics, just for fun
When I went to Davis my freshman year, 1678 was virtually unknown even in the Sacramento area. Now, less than five years later, they are number one in the world in auto, and second in the world in both RC and tote score.
You've come a long way, guys. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|