|
|
|
 Ahh yes, the good old "let's dedicate all our resources to absolutely cheesing the opponent alliance" strategy - Jaci [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Ahh yes, the good old "let's dedicate all our resources to absolutely cheesing the opponent alliance" strategy - Jaci [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#13
16-03-2015, 16:07
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
On one hand, I don't want the alarmist behaviors to continue. The intent of this rule is straightforward, and Q&A rulings are not actual rules. This holds no precedent over the manual, and inspectors have common sense.
On the other hand, 708 machined hubs for our Colson wheels this year (during build season). Are they illegal for us to use because another team helped manufacture them? Are they legal because we broached them? Do we have to list 708 as a sponsor? Is FIRST asking us to move away from this behavior? Btw, I would have no issue listing 708 as a sponsor. They're awesome. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode