|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
Wild-card scenarios right now: First two teams on finalist alliance (1114 and 2056 previous wins generating). If either rookie picks up RAS, the entire finalist alliance has a berth. Ditto if one of the alliance members from either alliance picks up EI or RCA (1114 and the rookies are ineligible for the latter). Right now, 1334 is probably really hoping for one of those things to happen (and it's highly likely).
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
As of this regional, 2056 has won 21 regionals without being defeated. Their next regional ends on April 4th. Last year The Undertaker entered Wrestlemania with a 21-0 record. On April 6th he left 21-1. Will 2056 suffer the same fate with their Undertaker streak?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
In previous games of win vs loses, I can see a bad matchup where that has happened before. But this year, it doesnt matter who you play against. For past Waterloo events, people paid attention to when 1114 played against 2056. This year, the matchup doesnt matter. In the end, the better teams just end up ranked higher. I cant remember a game where you could lock up the #1 seed after day 1 of qualifications, if ever. Personally, I'm a fan of it. You are less affected by bad match schedules and bad alliance seeds on the way to the finals. The better alliances win, generally speaking. There is no, good 1-4-5-8 bracket and hoping to be in the 2-3-6-7 bracket if that route is "easier" to get to the finals. Last year that had huge implications, especially since wild cards were being given out. Last edited by waialua359 : 21-03-2015 at 17:35. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
And I'd bet that 1114 and 2056 likes the scoring system much better than in the past of W-L's.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
Especially in Ontario with the inevitable essentially unstoppable 1114/2056 alliance pairing, it was nice to know that performance could get us a trip to the finals instead of sheer luck avoiding the 1-4-5-8 bracket*. I hope FIRST tries to keep the spirit of this year's qualification/elimination system next year, even if they return to W-L-T as primary sorting metric. *Especially once the "winners' 2nd champs tickets fall over to finalists" rules were introduced, avoiding the 1-4-5-8 bracket was the #1 priority for finals. I believe in 2013 we declined an alliance selection that would've made a stronger alliance simply because it would've lead us to 1114/2056 in the semis, but we needed to make the finals. Last edited by Bongle : 21-03-2015 at 18:03. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
Big shout out to 5406 and 3683!
5406 you guys are absolutely an amazing rookie team and deserve ever award you guys racked in today! Love to see more and more Canadian teams becoming so good so fast! 3683 Amazing as always! Always a pleasure to see your bot and team in action! Thank you for the opportunity to play with you and see you again soon! |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
5406 is looking like a team to rival 1717, or 4814 for best rookie season ever.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
What about 2056?
|
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
I love 1717, but their rookie season wasn't anything amazing when compared to 2056, or 5406 this year.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2015 Waterloo Regional
Interesting wildcard scenario here.
1114 and 2056 came in qualified for The Championship, so their win generated two wildcards. These were passed on to 3683 and 1334 (finalist first and second pick), as 5406 the finalist captain earned RAS. In addition to winning the event, 2056 also won Chairman's which created a dead wildcard, as there was no one left on the finalist alliance to give it to. 1241 won EI after winning Chairman's two weeks ago which resulted in a second unused wildcard. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|