|
|
|
 "Well, geez, I can't figure this out. I cut the piece [I]three times[/I] and it's still too short!" - joshsmithers [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
| "Well, geez, I can't figure this out. I cut the piece [I]three times[/I] and it's still too short!" - joshsmithers [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#13
27-03-2015, 09:39
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Should the Number One seed be Alloud to pick the Number Two seed?
The second letter in FIRST is for Inspiration. It does not make this program more inspiring to handicap #1 and #2 in eliminations. It is inspiring to watch #1 and #2 work together and perform to very high levels, possibly higher than seen before at that tournament. It is even more inspiring, though infrequent, when a lower ranked alliance digs deep and wins against an alliance containing #1 and #2 (i.e. Galileo 2013).
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode