Should the Number One seed be Alloud to pick the Number Two seed?

[Alan Anderson]

Originally Posted by Bongle

He's talking about the regional win rate - if through some rule change, the #1 alliance started winning 45% of the time, it means the other alliances would gain.

I can just barely read his note that way. Thanks for the explanation.

There's only 1 regional champion at each event.

Wildcards mean that's not the whole story. I think they do a good job of addressing the potential for one unusually dominant alliance to shut out everyone else.