|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Analysis of team ranking
so is this just if all teams were at the DC regional based on their score?
It would put us in the top 30% of teams... Last edited by MikLast : 28-03-2015 at 15:15. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Analysis of team ranking
Quote:
In most (qualification) matches robots operate reasonably independently from one another. This makes my question a lot easier to answer -- if robots don't influence each other's performance, then each robot should contribute (on average) the same score to any alliance it plays with. So I've got one variable per team -- how many points it contributes to its alliance -- and I'm trying to solve for the set of values for these variables that comes closest to predicting the actual match scores. The listing above is my estimate of how many points each robot contributes to its alliance (given no interaction with other robots) |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Analysis of team ranking
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Analysis of team ranking
I haven't done any in-depth analysis, but DC doesn't look too far out of line from the set of all regionals.
@MikLast I think I misinterpreted what you were saying. This would be a reasonable estimate of how well teams would do if each team played this game without an alliance. So congrats if you team is in the top 30%, you have a good robot ![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Analysis of team ranking
Ah, i misunderstood you also then. Thank you for clarifying, and i cant wait to show my team this next week.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|