|
|
|
 Our robot weighed 168lbs..... bring it on Trimspa!!! - slickguy2007 [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
| Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Our robot weighed 168lbs..... bring it on Trimspa!!! - slickguy2007 [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Highest Litter Scores
For your edification, here are the highest litter scores at Regionals through Week 5. Since different Regionals don't play the same number of matches, the following is an average per match at a given Regional.
Rank Average Team Regional 1....... 33.9... 3959.. Bayou 2....... 33.0... 1723.. Colorado 3....... 31.5... 5415.. Mexico City 4....... 30.1... 1114.. Waterloo 5....... 29.6.... 192.. Utah 6....... 28.5... 2036.. Colorado 7....... 27.2... 4009.. Central Illinois 8....... 26.8... 3158.. Mexico City 9....... 26.8... 3506.. North Carolina 10..... 26.4... 1410.. Colorado It is interesting to note that 6 of the top 10 scores came at high elevation events, Denver, Utah, and Mexico City. Guess noodles fly farther through thin air. 
|
|
#2
30-03-2015, 14:23
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
Jacob is the Noodle Ninja .........
He is at one with the Noodle ........ he has become the Noodle. He will Noodle again this week at the Smoky Mountain Regional and raise the bar.
|
|
#3
30-03-2015, 14:31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
I don't know if you were counting districts, but we averaged 26.5 per match (best at Hartford).
We don't try to noodle our cans, but our human player is getting better at better at throwing them (including throwing noodles into scored stacks). He's earned names like the Noodle Whisperer, the Noodle Messiah, Noodle Jesus, etc At RIDE during week 4, 2168's human player had a 29.5 average, with some perfect 40 point matches. Last edited by cjl2625 : 30-03-2015 at 14:42.
|
|
#4
30-03-2015, 14:35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
At St Joe:
2767 31.16 2959 28.1 (Our noodler wants it known that he had to throw from behind the wall for 2 matches because we had 2 chute bots on our team.
|
|
#5
30-03-2015, 14:48
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
Jacob was able to achieve his average at sea level in NO. I wonder how he'll do "at elevation" in Knoxville.
|
|
#6
30-03-2015, 15:35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
You are right, I only looked at Regionals, not Districts. I will put together an amended list and post it as soon as possible.
|
|
#7
30-03-2015, 15:40
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
Quote:
|
|
#8
30-03-2015, 15:55
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
Interestingly enough, my team had the highest litter points at the Finger Lakes Regional, with a total of 195. That only averages out to 17.2 per match in qualifications, yet FLR was a very competitive regional this year. I'm wondering why that is when other regionals with lower overall QA's had much better top litter scores. Maybe those top teams (in terms of litter score) are outliers?
|
|
#9
30-03-2015, 16:27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
Here is the corrected list of the Top 25 Litter Scores, including Districts. (Soooo many Districts....)
Rank Average Team Regional 1....... 33.9... 3959.. Bayou 2....... 33.0... 1723.. Colorado 3....... 31.5... 5415.. Mexico City 4....... 31.4... 3238.. PNW Glacier Peak 5....... 31.2... 2767.. FIM St. Joseph 6....... 30.9... 2767.. FIM Kentwood 7....... 30.1... 1114.. Waterloo 8....... 29.6.... 192.. Utah 9....... 29.5... 2168.. NE Rhode Island 10..... 28.9... 3238.. PNW Central Washington 11..... 28.9... 4188.. Peach Tree 12..... 28.5... 2036.. Colorado 13..... 28.2... 1647.. MAR Seneca 14..... 28.1... 2959... FIM St. Joseph 15..... 27.8... 2342... NE UNH 16..... 27.7... 1983... PNW Mt. Vernon 17..... 27.3... 1720... IN Kokomo 18..... 27.2... 4009.. Central Illinois 19..... 26.8... 3158.. Mexico City 20..... 26.8... 3506.. North Carolina 21..... 26.7... 2474.. FIM St. Joseph 22..... 26.7... 2342.. NE Granite State 23..... 26.7... 2522.. PNW Auburn 24..... 26.5... 2067.. NE Hartford 25..... 26.4... 1410.. Colorado Note: This list was edited to correct a mistake; accidentally left out 4188 at #11 Last edited by rclothier : 30-03-2015 at 18:57. Reason: Corrected a mistake
|
|
#10
30-03-2015, 16:29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
Quote:
|
|
#11
30-03-2015, 16:29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
I'm almost certain this is total litter score, including bins and thrown litter. So I'm not sure it has any utility at all. Except my team is near the top, so I like it very much.
|
|
#12
30-03-2015, 16:36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
I can put together a similar list of lowest scores, sure. Might not be the most "gracious" thing, but it could be enlightening.
|
|
#13
30-03-2015, 16:49
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
Quote:
|
|
#14
30-03-2015, 18:49
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
Quote:
Code:
event Team M LpM LAKE 3959 9 33.89 CODE 1723 10 33.00 MXMC 5415 11 31.45 WASNO 3238 12 31.42 MISJO 2767 12 31.17 MIKEN 2767 12 30.92 ONWA 1114 13 30.08 UTWV 192 10 29.60 RISMI 2168 12 29.50 WAELL 3238 12 28.92 GADU 4188 8 28.88 CODE 2036 10 28.50 NJTAB 1647 12 28.17 MISJO 2959 12 28.08 NHDUR 2342 12 27.75 WAMOU 1983 12 27.67 INKOK 1720 12 27.25 ILIL 4009 12 27.17 MXMC 3158 11 26.82 NCRE 3506 10 26.80 MISJO 2474 12 26.67 NHNAS 2342 12 26.67 WAAHS 2522 12 26.67 CTHAR 2067 12 26.50 CODE 1410 10 26.40
|
|
#15
30-03-2015, 18:50
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Highest Litter Scores
Per request, here is a list of the lowest per-match Litter scores at a Regional or District.
Rank Score Team Event 1....... 0.1... 148.. Dallas 2....... 0.7...2170.. NE Waterbury 3....... 0.9...4845.. Lake Superior 4....... 0.9...3461.. NE Waterbury 5....... 1.0...5143.. Lake Superior 6....... 1.2...3350.. Dallas 7....... 1.3...1124.. NE Waterbury 8....... 1.3....987.. Dallas 9....... 1.3...4818.. Lake Superior 10..... 1.3....236.. NE Waterbury 11..... 1.3...1071.. NE Waterbury 12..... 1.4...2897.. Dallas What we can take from this is there wasn't as much noodle action in Week 1, which produced all of these scores. So, let's put the data to some better use. First of all, the litter scores generally increased week by week. Here is the average of the lowest and highest litter score at each event week by week: Week 1: 34.2 / 202.6 Week 2: 54.2 / 239.4 Week 3: 55.2 / 227.3 Week 4: 67.3 / 282.6 Week 5: 70.3 / 263.5 The average high Litter score was 246, while the average low score was 58. The scores also varied widely between events. For example, the lowest scores at Mexico City (140) and PNW Central Washington (130) were higher than the highest score at Dallas (117), Waterbury (110), and New York (128). Interestingly, not all low Litter scorers were bad teams. In fact, 3 of the low scorers (out of 88) ended up ranked #1: 148 at Dallas, 33 at FIM Southfield, and 125 at NE Rhode Island. However, scoring high is always helpful: 17 of the high Litter scorers ranked #1, and 9 were ranked #2. The average Rank of the high Litter scorer at each event was 7.9, while for the low Litter scorer, it was 29.6. So on average, higher ranked teams did better (not surprisingly). The average team number for the high Litter scorer was 2490, while for low scorers it was 2929. So it skews a bit toward older teams, but not much. What's it all mean? Litter points are helpful, but you can have a successful strategy that doesn't rely heavily on them. Last edited by rclothier : 30-03-2015 at 18:55.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
