|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: PNW CHAMPS
Quote:
![]() |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PNW CHAMPS
They are going to attempt adding another claw to the robot to stabilize the bin when they have a stack. Should be interesting to see how it works.
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: PNW CHAMPS
Yep, he is absolutely right. Already have about 50% of it done.
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: PNW CHAMPS
Sounds sweet. Can't wait to see it in action!
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: PNW CHAMPS
Quote:
How fast is it from initiation to contact with the can? And how accurate do you need to be with lining up? |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: PNW CHAMPS
Based on frame analysis, 26 frames (.867 seconds) from the sound of the piston to the first hit on the can. 7 (.233 seconds) more frames till it stabilizes. 1 more frame till the robot moves back. All at 30fps.
Last edited by Metonym : 31-03-2015 at 13:34. Reason: added seconds for those that didn't realize the frame rate |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: PNW CHAMPS
Quote:
Accuracy hasn't been an issue in our testing. We guarantee alignment during robot placement and the system is rigid enough that it hits the same spot every time. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: PNW CHAMPS
Team Mean Machine is super excited to play with all of our Northwest friends again.
Of course, we have some changes in store as well. We changed to rollers on our lifter, which is lighter (1 lb) and more robust than the plastic slides. We designed a new claw for can manipulation. It's heavier (4 lbs), but much quicker, and can handle noodles. We changed the swerves to mini-cims for a 2.5 pounds of weight savings, and the robot seems just about the same in terms of performance. We created can burglars for robbing two cans from the step. We also created cheese cake versions for our partners, if that plays out. They weigh less than 2.5 pounds for a pair, and can grab the cans in about 0.5 seconds. Bryce took some nice 240 fps video of it. Hopefully he'll post some here. It's encouraging to see all the improvement over the season as well as the big jump from last year. The district system is really helping all the teams in the PNW, from the top to the bottom, to get more play and iterate on their designs for stronger competition. |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: PNW CHAMPS
Quote:
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: PNW CHAMPS
So many great teams competing this weekend at PNW Championship!
This will the 1st time a championship event is played in week 6. It should be exciting to see the scores and the level of play approach new highs. Good luck to all. Last edited by lynca : 31-03-2015 at 18:35. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: PNW CHAMPS
Sounds like we have all been busy. Best part of districts, you never stop improving your robot.
|
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: PNW CHAMPS
Based on numbers scraped of FIRST's website over the past few days here's the list of teams who have declined their invitiations (in order of district points scored):
5779 3968 4654 4132 As expected for an event in a remote location this is a longer list than last year. And here's the list of replacement teams (by team number): 3789 4608 4681 Since there are only three of them we currently have a 63-team rather than a 64-team event. There may be reasons that teams have appeared or disappeared from lists other than declining invitations or being invited as a replacement, but I don't know what those would be. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: PNW CHAMPS
Quote:
I can confirm that 5779 and 3968 are two of the teams that have declined. So yes a team has been invited for every team that has declined. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|