|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
Quote:
Also it looks to be a very cool robot. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
Regardless of record - that is one heck of a robot! definitely one of my favorite robots this season!
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
your robot is cool, and I have a question or two
why not set it up in the 60 seconds before the match instead of doing the things in auto? were you having trouble getting it down to just a minute? (it would let you canburgle in auto) also how on earth did you get that under 120 lbs? |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
Quote:
I can't think of any other massive-expansion robots; you have to look prior to 2006 for them. Now, height of the robot is another story... |
|
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
Quote:
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
1710 was around 8.5ft tall last year and that height was static. Haven't seen another bot yet that has matched it.
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
Well, for starters, you'd be surprised what you have weight for when you get rid of a drive train and use no CIM motors. We could have reduced weight on the stacker but we wanted as much as we could afford in the stacker to counterbalance the crane. We also found that mangling a couple wal-mart ladders could give some decent structure on the conveyor for very low weight and the structure of the crane is almost entirely thin aluminum bent and riveted into rectangular tubes. There was alot of other stuff we wanted to add to our robot but did not have the weight for. We had a plan in the works to get the other 2 containers off the step using suction cup shooting crossbows.
![]() |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
This - Nicely done, but now I have a question. How does the robot move after creating the stack if you don't have a drivetrain?
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
Probably passive wheels/bearings and the same stack-pushing concept y'all had.
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
Just so much Wow there, great design and execution to have a complex machine make weight and function.
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
Maybe build the first stack against the wall and then push against the stack to move yourself down?
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this an FRC record?
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|