|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Chips at 9.8:1 main reduction, with a 2:1 low gear, 1:2 high gear, and a final 3:1 sprocket reduction. That gives us:
58.8:1 Low Gear 14.7:1 High Gear We're using 6" custom machined wheels, giving final theoretical speeds of 9 ft/sec in high, and a little under 2 ft/sec in low. It's essentially our same drivetrain from last year, which was one of the fastest and most powerful drivetrains around. We weren't the absolute best, but we were up there in the speed and power categories. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How much planning goes into your robot? | Jnadke | General Forum | 41 | 29-01-2006 21:29 |
| Friction, traction, torque - oh my... | Gui Cavalcanti | Technical Discussion | 30 | 13-08-2002 18:01 |
| WASH Palm scouting at the Championship | Mike Soukup | Scouting | 2 | 19-04-2002 15:14 |
| Index of team's post about their robot... | Ken Leung | Robot Showcase | 1 | 20-03-2002 17:10 |
| about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 12 | 26-11-2001 09:39 |