|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Pretty simple... I'm sure FIRST profited from Champs last year, at 400 teams. Run a second version of Champs and you're profiting a second time.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Because a non-profit, profits? Any money that goes into FIRST only benefits FIRST teams and makes the program better. I don't see any issue with FIRST getting more money, they are very transparent in what it is used for.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
Its ridiculous the amount of money the average first team needs to raise to go to more than one event including a new diluted championship. Regardless of what the non-profit does with it. There's common sense. Lower costs if they go this route...yet we all know that will not happen. Someone gets that money sure isn't FRC teams. Last edited by Boltman : 09-04-2015 at 12:06. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
They could be way better about disclosing expenses.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
I was under the impression that they didn't, but I'm running from anecdotes and conversations rather than hard data.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Can we start a petition against this?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Thats what this thread is.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Has there been a single positive post about this change yet in this thread?
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Ive seen all negative, some neutral, but not a single positive post; and thats counting as this is the 88th post.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Noooooo!
Atlanta mayor/GA governor why? Fingers crossed for 2019 ![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
I love how all of us came together and are trashing how bad this decision actually is.
Hopefully, FIRST realizes the same. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
There you go. Houston == South Super Regional Detroit == North Super Regional Once you have a big enough volunteer base, FRC champs returns. I'm open to hearing from the naysayers on the thread about alternate approaches to implementing super regionals, that directly address constraints on event volunteer growth, the fuel that FIRST events run on. I think this is exactly the right time to be announcing this. They want it out there prior to Champs so that they can get feedback and talk to the rationale behind the change. If they were really trying to hide the ball, this would come out at 8am on April 26, or they'd announce it at Kickoff. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
What are our constructive criticisms? How would we fix the system by 2017? |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Every region gets districts... place some flex regionals in low population areas If needed. Progress teams to Champs from district championships. Low level teams get the "champ experience" at the district champs. High level teams still get to compete for a world title. Everyone wins.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Add me to the list of people that don't like this idea. Why North and South? I could maybe see East and West but not North and South. It is the same cost for our team to travel to Huston or Detroit or St Louis. So we are not saving any money.
IRI Time to step up your event. You will need to become bigger and better so you can host the true World Champions and see who comes out winner. Who's ready for a multiple field IRI? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|