Quote:
Originally Posted by efoote868
Right, but assigning all 1st place teams to the premier event will not get to 400 teams, so the supplemental teams can be assigned based on geography.
Point is that details are not set in stone, and I trust Frank to do right by us.
|
No. No, no, no, no. First, congrats on disincentivizing 1st seeds picking 2nd seeds. 2nd seed sure would think twice about accepting if winning meant they'd only go to the Loser's Championship. Second, yes, you really would be creating a Loser's Championship. Your whole purpose is to create a "real" Champs with all the "good" teams, and, well, that other Champs with all those other teams. Two geographically segregated Champs may or may not be a good idea, but I'm pretty sure a "premier" Champs and "that other" Champs is a terrible one for the health of the community.
Never underestimate the ability of a team of high school students and engineers to break expensive things. - Alan Anderson [more] 
09-04-2015, 17:01
Threaded Mode