|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Preparing for the Town Hall Meeting on the New Championships Format
To those making a proposal, observe that you are engaging in a classic product definition exercise.
Prior to thinking too much about a proposal, it is worth spending some time thinking about what attributes a proposal might be judged on. Here are attributes that were discussed in the other thread: . Cost of attendance for teams, including travel . Presents FRC as entertainment . Venue availability . Event volunteer availability (both key and regular volunteers) . Team mentor availability . Team member availability . FRC staff availability . Fits between New Year's Day and AP test day . Number of teams participating . Avoiding events developing persistent easier/harder reputations . Equipment (field) availability . Economic feasibility . Every team has the opportunity to attend, at a minimum, once every four years / number of students inspired by event . The result of the annual competition is a single champion alliance . Capacity of event to inspire students . Ability of teams to decide where they compete . Ability to inspire FLL/FTC teams via co-location Ideas for others? One might then consider building a House of Quality to compare various proposals on these attributes. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|