|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
1987 is the best robot not going. They would do well with one that can cap their stacks. They only missed by one point going to elimination rounds at Buckeye. I was heartbroken watching that match. I can only hope and pray they will get invited from the waitlist.
|
|
#47
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
I'd like to cast a vote for 283. Only saw them play at Peachtree, but they were highly capable of putting up two capped six stacks by themselves from the HP. And highly deserving of being the number one overall pick by 1319.
|
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
Quote:
177 179 283 334 456 696 846 865 868 1126 1287 1507 1657 1731 1987 2077 2102 2175 2194 2472 2485 2509 3055 3117 3230 3299 3883 4500 4539 4655 4859 4917 5172 |
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
3276 had a good performance this year(Awesome landfill bot). They were picked 1st overall at Lake superior.
|
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
Looks like 25 just got added from the wait list.
|
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
Actually the declines have finally been updated in the system, so teams from NE, MAR and FIM are getting added as teams above them decline their invitations.
Looks like 3 declines in MAR, 7 in NE and 1 in FIM. |
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
1987's robot can make 5 stacks of 6, but not capped. If they get picked from the wait list and are put in a division with a team that can consistently cap 6 stacks, noodle or no noddle, and can grab containers from the step. They will be a terrifying alliance to compete against. Especially if they can also get a team that is a landfill bot and can create several uncapped stacks on the platform not used by 1987.
Another amazing team that isn't going to worlds is 67. If I am not mistaken. They were knocked out of Quarter-finals at the Michigan District Championship. After winning both of the District Events they attended. And an average score of 126.83. That is the sad thing about Districts. Amazing teams that deserve to go to worlds have a harder time getting there, as they have to score high in the point system to make it to the championship then they have to either win, get chairman's or get E.I. |
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
67 is an HOF team, so they should be qualified to go.
|
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
Quote:
http://frc-districtrankings.usfirst.org/FIM/67 |
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
Quote:
EDIT: I stand corrected. Last edited by Link07 : 14-04-2015 at 20:00. |
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
I'm pretty sure districts makes it EASIER for good teams to qualify.
|
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
Agreed. This is why MN is so underrepresented at champs without the districts system.
|
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
4285 also declined their invite
|
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
Well another reason is also that they lost 5/12 regional champ spots from their own regionals.
|
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
True. Some non-MN teams did win at MN regionals. Even if those 5 slots did go to MN teams MN would still be underrepresented. Also keep in mind some of those slots were made up because teams like 525 and 2826 gave wildcards to the finalist alliances they faced as well.
Last edited by jajabinx124 : 14-04-2015 at 20:08. Reason: typo |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|