|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
Or you know....we can form our own alliances to the best of our ability! |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
It has happened. I love Game Theory. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
I hope not. 948 will not tank any matches. If 1114 and 148 become alliance partners, so be it. We'll either have to find a way to beat them or salute them as they advance to Einstein. With that said, I think it's time to design the world's fastest canburgler. We can beat 1114-148 juggernaut if they are limited to3 RC's.... |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Team 5586 is excited to compete in Curie! We are looking forward to seeing all of the teams compete, should be pretty interesting to see and learn from all of the veteran teams competing. We will make sure to take in all of the advice we possibly can so we can hopefully have a great 2nd season next year!
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
I think one thing we will see at Champs in general is a LOT of co-op. At MSC there was at least an attempt at co-op in almost every match. All of the teams there realized that co-op was worth a lot to a team's average score, and getting it can really keep that team ranking high.
With all this talk of 1114 and 148 being the dominating robots in Curie, I think it is important to mention that neither have demonstrated an ability to place a co-op stack on the step. They can both build one in auto, which makes it really easy for an alliance partner to just pick up and score, but if 1114 and 148 have to trust other teams with their oh so important average score with a 40 pt co-op stack, I can see many situations where their ranking can slip out of their control. I would say 1114 and 148, if they were to join forces, would most likely make it to Einstein finals, but that all depends on their ability to seed in the right place in quals. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
Techfire 225 in MAR was consistently 20 points or so above the rest of the pack when it came to alliance selection. Where did those 20 points come from? They were the only team that could consistently make an auto stack. If teams decided to no co-op with the "powerhouses" it would deny them at least 20 points/match (40 if they are stacked). So teams have to decide....will the 40 points help them more than it will hurt the leaders? Do they take the points for themselves or try and "help the greater good"? |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Not to be rude, but could we move this thread to the Championship folder?
That way they are all in one place. We return you to your regularly scheduled thread ![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
I apologize. Can someone move this please.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
From NE Champs, I know Team 88, TJ^2, has a burglar running. We put one together at the competition and had some success. I believe they are working on a more permanent model for St. Louis. I also remember Team 230, Gaelhawks, consistently grabbing cans as well.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
curie and carson in einstein finals im calling it know.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
1114 and 148 may not do anything with the coop stack but in the time that they would work on doing it they both have the ability to put up 42 points with another capped 6 stack with litter. This negates the potential losses from not doing the coop stack or set. The only issue they could run into for those points is if they lose all of the cans in a match, which is something I don't believe would happen in qualifications.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|