|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Georgia Districts
From an email I received today:
Quote:
Also I'm glad we are finally trying to ditch the 65+ team regional model. I was not at all happy with the number of matches we got, and this district model would fix all of those issues. Thoughts? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
After seeing how big Peachtree was this year and how few matches each team got to play, I like it.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
As a South Carolina team with rapidly decreasing regional options, I don't like the idea of losing two regionals. But it could be very good for Georgia.
Any idea of when Georgia may move to this model? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
The survey said the move is happening in the next two years. They're strongly pushing to move next year though. I'd personally like to have a district with South Carolina, since our regionals have a lot of overlap in terms of teams. From what I've heard, North Carolina is almost dead set on going to districts next year as well.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
An Alabama Regional seems to be in the works, but it would be weird if the only options for south carolina teams would be an overcrowded Palmetto Regional, a growing Smoky Mountain Regional, or hop over one state to Alabama. Ideally we'd have SC and NC or GA and SC combine into one district. I'd wager Tennessee and Alabama would both take a while to form districts, and Tennessee would likely split and join up with an established system or have its own district due to the size of its state.
Last edited by Anupam Goli : 16-04-2015 at 13:23. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
They announced at the Smoky Mountains Regional that there will be an Alabama Regional next year.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
It's official, the Rocket City Regional will be held in Huntsville, AL next year. Time and location TBD.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
I am in support of GA districts and it's great to hear AL getting a regional now too. With Palmetto, GSC, and Peachtree full this was something I expected soon.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
First off congrats GA for reaching district potential. We will miss competing with you all if things go this way however districts are rather appealing and that is where it is at.
Somewhat off topic I would like to suggest the following.... F.I.S. FIRST In the South South Carolina:37 North Carolina:42 Georgia:49 Tennessee:38 West Virginia:4 Virginia:69 Kentucky:12 Total of 251 teams. You could easily have 12 district events and 1 district championship and qualify far more teams. After a year or two of team growth you could break this large district into smaller ones potentially having one district for each state at some point. Low registration fees for all, more matches for all, and lower travel costs for most. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
Glad to hear Districts will be coming to the Southeast US in the next year or two! It's a huge improvement to the regional model, imho! You can really see it helping out FIRST teams throughout New England... many teams, young and old, had become stagnant and just hadn't been as productive... now you see many teams really thriving (again)!
My suggestion would be to try to create Districts larger than a single state... while Indiana has definitely proved you can do it with a ~40-50 team state, I think the dynamic really works best when you have ~80-150+ teams. That's large enough to really get the benefit of playing with teams at the DCMP you haven't competed with before, and to create a big group of teams with a strong sense of solidarity. While the 'Super Southest Region' of everyone south of the Mason-Dixon and east of the Mississippi seems a little unreasonable for a District CMP, I think having 3 or 4 districts that encompass this region would probably be a reasonable number. Obviously if Districts got well above 250 teams or so, they may want to start splitting apart... but then again Michigan seems to be doing well with its 350 team district! Seems like the 'cores' of some potential Districts in the SE could be: - Virginia & Maryland - Georgia & South Carolina - Florida? - Tennessee? - West Verginia would most likely join with Virginia and Maryland (but could perhaps join an Ohio & Western PA district). - North Carolina could probably join with either Virginia and Maryland or with Georgia and South Carolina. - Florida could potentially become it's own district, but joining with Georgia and South Carolina would also make some sense (more so if NC were to join VA and MD) - Alabama would probably join with Georgia and South Carolina, although with plans to host their own Regional in 2016, that would seem to push that timeline out to at least 2017. - Kentucky could form a smaller district (~50 teams) with Tennessee, or perhaps try joining with TN, VA, WV, and MD for a large district of >200 teams... although spread out across a larger and longer area than the PNW. A Possible Set of Combinations: - Capital Region: Virginia, Maryland, West Virginia, North Carolina and Washington DC - Southeast Region: Georgia, South Carolina, Florida, and Alabama - 'Central' Region: Tennessee and Kentucky - Mississippi River Region: Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi
|
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
Current plan is for West Virginia to be joining Ohio and western Pennsylvania when they form their district. And the plan is for 2017 las I heard. This actually makes much more sense than Virginia geographically. I hope that eventually western MD could join us, though.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Georgia Districts
Hate to see a solid event like Peachtree come off the board, but congrats to our neighbors for seeing the growth to make districts viable. After three years of 60-some-odd-team regionals, I know I can't wait for the change either.
----------- For those that keep asking about South Carolina: I've talked with Frank Lanford (the Palmetto RD) about this one at length. There has been no down-to-brass-tacks talk about us playing in any district system next year, either alone or as a multi-state region. Judging from how Indiana pulled it off and from our neighbors, my bet is on a one-state district around 2017-2018 once our team count gets north of 50. (We were at 41 this year, Indiana had 49.) The other Good Guy Frank wouldn't flip the switch without plenty of dialogue first. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|