|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
Somebody's likely going to break their canburglar during a war on the step well before the finals, and I wouldn't be suprised if we see some pretty bloody battles in elims and Einstein over those cans. I propose an over-under of 4 canburglars broken in the elims as a whole, maybe more. Will be interesting to watch.
|
|
#107
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
My predictions
1. At least 6 alliances on Einstein will have a Michigan team 2. Most of the division champions will be a combination of #1 and #2 teams 3. One of the divisional champions will be made up of a non-obvious combination of robots that hasn't been made before, and could potentially win it all. |
|
#108
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
Quote:
|
|
#109
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
Will mecanum wheels finally make it to the Einstein carpet this year? That's the real question.
![]() |
|
#110
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
Quote:
That being said, if anyone wants to make this happen, I'll help as much as I can. |
|
#111
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
the first person with legitimate strategy
|
|
#112
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
I agree. It makes scouting much more valuable, so the whole team, not just the drive team, can feel it has contributed.
|
|
#113
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
And someone else suggested 330 on the alliance with two other powerhouses, but who also will be an alliance captain and in the mix.
|
|
#114
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
That post was from the "If all the best teams by OPR got on the same alliance" prediction.
Last edited by CaptainKirby : 17-04-2015 at 11:35. Reason: Wording problem |
|
#115
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
Top 25 at Champs.
254 The Cheesy Poofs 1400 carson 1114 Simbotics 1387 curie 2056 OP Robotics 1247 galileo 118 Robonauts 1053 newton 1678 Citrus Circuits 993 newton 624 CRyptonite 676 Tesla 2826 Wave Robotics 658 hopper 1986 Team Titanium 498 carver 1023 Bedford Express 469 archimedes 33 Killer Bees 461 hopper 1325 Inverse Paradox 431 carson 1690 Orbit 409 galileo 971 Spartan Robotics 389 carver 2338 Gear It Forward 373 archimedes 2122 Team Tators 310 tesla 2085 RoboDogs 298 carson 1756 Argos 295 newton 3683 Team Dave 288 hopper 368 Team Kika Mana 271 carver 1538 The Holy Cows 269 archimedes 469 Las Guerrillas 252 hopper 701 RoboVikes 241 curie 525 Swartdogs 209 galileo 548 Robostangs 199 hopper 3824 HVA RoHAWKtics 191 tesla 118/1678 in Newton seem pretty formidable, especially since they have played together and have the expertise to cheesecake both their 3rd and 4th picks. Whoever gets to Einstein, the competition will be both sublime and intense. Both 254 and 1114 are very strong, and depending how they pick their allies, can be hard to beat. There seems to be a big gap between 1678 (993 QA) and 2826 (658 QA), but it is the strength of the alliance, not the individual top seed that counts. It might actually help to have both your third and 4th picks to be can grabbers, since it possible to sustain damage in a tug-of-war as 971 found out at SVR. Anyway, it will be fun to watch. Go Teams! |
|
#116
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
Quote:
|
|
#117
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
I honestly think that this year is the year a PNW team goes to Einstein. I hope it's us but I'd be thrilled to see any PNW team make it.
![]() |
|
#118
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
Quote:
|
|
#119
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
Quote:
![]() |
|
#120
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Champs Predictions
There are a couple of teams in the PNW that very much belong in any "Top 25" list - 4488 and 1983 come to mind specifically.... There are also a handful that are strong enough (though may have been a bit inconsistent during the season) that they could potentially disrupt their divisions, depending on how the pairings work out.... 2471, 955, 1318, 2550, 3663, 4061 and 948 come to mind.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|