|
#61
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
Quote:
|
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
|
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
3339 is very excited to be able to play with so many amazing teams
SEE YOU !! |
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
This is going to be such a competitive division, I can't wait to get to work with these teams and some of our friends from PNW! #StackCity
|
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
Team 60 is excited to make some PHAT $TACK$ with everyone!
This is definitely going to be the most exciting and competitive field! Good luck to everyone in advance! |
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
|
|
#67
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
FIRST Robotics Team 5122 the RobOTies would like to share some photos of our robot:
https://www.facebook.com/frc5122/posts/647727005359627 By removing 3 parts we can be 10.5 LB underweight so cheesecake is an option! Last edited by Mr. B : 17-04-2015 at 21:46. |
|
#68
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
Quote:
|
|
#69
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
I've taken a stab at calculating everyone's "Strength of Schedule" (SOS) in Carson using the preliminary schedule. You can find the results here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing This was a little different than what I did last year (which was use OPR to predict a "win margin" for each team at each match and then average the predicted win margin). This year, I thought the best way to show SOS was, for each team, calculate the average number of *points* all of their alliance partners will bring to their matches (where max OPR is a stand in for points in this method). A team's own OPR is ignored, as are the OPRs of the opposing alliance. This ignores the resource constraints that will come into play during the high scoring matches (the limited number of chutes and cans), and any unique pairings that might help or hurt a team's efficiency, but I think it's a good first effort. The data could be useful for planning strategy, and might also influence scouting. Feel free to suggest modifications to my method! And I'm sorry for team 1629 ![]() Last edited by nuclearnerd : 19-04-2015 at 00:16. |
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
Quote:
Planning has started already. Can't wait unil Wedbesday. |
|
#71
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
Quote:
|
|
#72
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
Quote:
|
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
Let's remember these teams with super high negative rank differences (like 1629) when picking...
(not at all motivated by the fact that my team has the third most negative rank difference ) |
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
Quote:
![]() |
|
#75
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2015 Carson Division
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|