|
Re: What percentage of FRC teams should attend championships?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb Sykes
Quote:
|
I'm pretty sure that a very good answer to the question is, "Just as many as can fit into the largest feasible venue(s)."
|
That is an insufficient response. You will at least need to specify the number of venues for this sentence to mean anything. |
Nope
It is a perfectly fine response. What it means is that the question, in the sense/context it was posed, is nearly irrelevant.
It means that instead of thinking of the Championship(s) as an event that filters out unworthy teams; one should instead think of a Championship(s) as an event that brings in as many teams as is possible.
How many teams attend the FIRST Championship(s) should depend on how many teams can be accommodated by the venue, the number of conference speakers, etc; and not some arbitrarily chosen threshold of match-worthiness.
FRC includes competition matches, but FRC's purpose is not competition matches.
YMMV
Blake
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases  I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
|
Banned for being a nerd. There are no nerds in here! - Schnabel [more] 
Threaded Mode