|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Which ideas do you like? | |||
| Remove totes and add RCs to the Step |
|
60 | 35.29% |
| Add RCs to the edge of each scoring platform |
|
37 | 21.76% |
| Flip all landfill totes so they're facing up |
|
106 | 62.35% |
| Increase tote points (ex: 2-3) |
|
50 | 29.41% |
| Decrease RC points (ex: 4-2) |
|
15 | 8.82% |
| Remove throwing litter |
|
82 | 48.24% |
| Introduce litter javalins to knock over stacks |
|
31 | 18.24% |
| Remove the step |
|
31 | 18.24% |
| 6 co-op totes stacked on the step =60pts |
|
82 | 48.24% |
| Remove penalties for co-op totes going over the step |
|
113 | 66.47% |
| Let co-op totes be scored as grey totes |
|
110 | 64.71% |
| Exponential tote stack scoring (1,4,9,16,25,36) |
|
32 | 18.82% |
| Remove the 6-tote high stack limit |
|
36 | 21.18% |
| Best 2 out of 3 eliminations (drop lowest score) |
|
107 | 62.94% |
| Eliminate co-op |
|
34 | 20.00% |
| Increase the starting amount of totes for HPs |
|
64 | 37.65% |
| Multiple litter in 1 RC |
|
32 | 18.82% |
| Increase totes in the landfill |
|
16 | 9.41% |
| Co-op totes add points if scored in stacks |
|
52 | 30.59% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 170. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
IRI Rule Changes Vote
I am in no way a deciding factor in IRI whatsoever, but I like thinking of which changes could help a game as controversial as Recycle Rush become more likable.
I took some of the more popular ideas from the IRI rule change thread, so none of these are my idea. Also keep in mind that we should try to keep changes to the FMS scoring system as minor as possible. Which ideas do you, as the Chief Delphi Community, think will make Recycle Rush a better and more competitive game? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Changes Vote
-Replace some totes on the Step with Containers
-Flip the upside-down totes to right side up -Make Auto worth more? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Changes Vote
Wait, is this supposed to be a poll thread? If so I don't see the poll.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: IRI Rule Changes Vote
Is there supposed to be a poll or a link to a poll? If not this is pretty much just a duplicate of the existing IRI Rule modifications thread.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Changes Vote
Took me a while, got it
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Changes Vote
The BEST idea I heard all season is from Dennis Jenks of 254.
Keep the game exactly the same, EXCEPT make the step cans available the last 30 seconds of the match only. Think about that for awhile........ |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Changes Vote
Quote:
Best two out of three is how it has been previous years. This would remove the aspect of averages for eliminations and move it to a W-L-T for elims Drop the lowest score keeps the current average elimination style but drops the lowest of the three or two (quarters) played |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Changes Vote
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Changes Vote
What about eliminating a tether requirement for passive ramps? Allows teams to use their can burglars and ramps in the same match without having to tether their ramp to a partner. Or, allow just the tether to pass through the Autonomous Zone before the match begins.
Last edited by Sam Slade : 28-04-2015 at 15:54. Reason: Finishing a thought |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Changes Vote
That'd be great for teams that didn't need a can at the start of their stack and for teams like 27 that focus on capping six stacks. It would not be good for other designs like 254, 1114 and ours though.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Changes Vote
For the flipping landfill totes idea, in the other thread, Billfred suggested having alliances be able to choose whether or not that back line of landfill totes was flipped or not, such that teams with specific canburglars wouldn't be affected by the dimensional change.
I personally think thats a genius way of doing it. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Changes Vote
Why is everyone against the upside down totes? Isn't that part of the challenge? Our robot is able to manipulate upside down totes in multiple ways, as is 2337 and I'm sure a few more that I'm missing. Probably more bots than you expect with a wheeled intake can suck an upside down tote in as a base for a stack.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI Rule Changes Vote
There seems to be a good amount of great ideas I missed, so I'll make a new poll soon with new ideas, and I'll keep some of the other poll options that have a good number of votes.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|