|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I think the idea is that if the robot is at an angle (not flipped) and digging in the carpet, causing damage the ref can put it back down parallel
seems like its only if the one robot is at an angle and not going any farther (all energy goes into wrecking carpet rather than flipping robot) makes sense to me. Doesnt sound like they are going to be "righting" flipped robots in general though. Sorry Im tired and I know full well this post makes no sense. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question: Gas Shocks?? Official answer | Mike Martus | OCCRA | 0 | 28-10-2003 10:25 |
| Robot/Goal scoring: Official Answer Mike Martus | Mike Martus | OCCRA | 6 | 21-10-2003 23:51 |
| Q&A Traction Question answer | Cory | Technical Discussion | 4 | 09-01-2003 06:37 |
| Joe - Please answer my question | archiver | 2000 | 2 | 24-06-2002 00:14 |
| Using Base 36 "Compression" For Easier Scouting and Other Interesting Tidbits | Adrian Wong | Rules/Strategy | 9 | 21-09-2001 20:28 |