|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Incorporating Opposing Alliance Information in CCWM Calculations
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Incorporating Opposing Alliance Information in CCWM Calculations
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Incorporating Opposing Alliance Information in CCWM Calculations
Iterative Interpretations of OPR and WMPR
(I found this interesting: some other folks might or some other folks might not. )Say you want to estimate a team's offensive contribution to their alliance scores. A simple approach is just compute the team's average match score/3. Let's call this estimate O(0), a vector of the average match score/3 for all teams at step 0. (/3 because there are 3 teams per alliance. This would be /2 for FTC). But then you want to take into account the fact that a team's alliance partners may be better or worse than average. The best estimate you have of the contribution of a team's partners at this point is the average of their O(0) estimates. So let the improved estimate be O(1) = team's average match score - 2*average ( O(0) for a team's alliance partners). (2*average because there are 2 partners contributing per match. This would be 1*average for FTC.) This is better, but now we have an improved estimate for all teams, so we can just iterate this: O(2) = team's average match score - 2*average ( O(1) for a team's alliance partners). O(3) = team's average match score - 2*average ( O(2) for a team's alliance partners). etc. etc. This sequence of O(i) converges to the OPR values, so this is just another way of explaining what OPRs are. WMPR can be iteratively computed in a similar way. W(0) = team's average match winning margin W(1) = team's average match winning margin - 2*average ( W(0) for a team's alliance partners) + 3*average ( W(0) for a team's opponents ). W(2) = team's average match winning margin - 2*average ( W(1) for a team's alliance partners) + 3*average ( W(1) for a team's opponents ). etc. etc. This sequence of W(i) converges to the WMPR values, so this is just another way of explaining what WMPRs are. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|