Go to Post I've never liked the pressure pads. This just confirms my suspicions: Pressure pads hate robots. It must be some inferiority complex or something. - Andy A. [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-05-2015, 15:54
wgardner's Avatar
wgardner wgardner is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 171
wgardner is a splendid one to beholdwgardner is a splendid one to beholdwgardner is a splendid one to beholdwgardner is a splendid one to beholdwgardner is a splendid one to beholdwgardner is a splendid one to beholdwgardner is a splendid one to behold
Re: Incorporating Opposing Alliance Information in CCWM Calculations

[Edit: The data has been updated to reflect an error in the previous code. Previously, the data was reported for the scaled down versions of the metrics in the TESTING DATA section. Now, the data is reported for the unscaled metrics (though the last table for each tournament shows the benefits of scaling them, which is substantial!)]

Here's the data for the four 2014 tournaments starting with "A". My thoughts will be in a subsequent post:

Code:
2014: archi
Teams = 100, Matches = 167, Matches Per Team = 1.670

TRAINING DATA
Stdev of winning margin prediction residual
OPR :  51.3.	 66.9% of outcome variance predicted.
CCWM:  57.0.	 59.2% of outcome variance predicted.
WMPR:  36.1.	 83.6% of outcome variance predicted.

Match prediction outcomes
OPR : 142 of 166  (85.5 %)
CCWM: 146 of 166  (88.0 %)
WMPR: 154 of 166  (92.8 %)

TESTING DATA
Stdev of winning margin prediction residual
OPR :  72.1.	 34.8% of outcome variance predicted.
CCWM:  85.2.	  8.8% of outcome variance predicted.
WMPR:  89.3.	 -0.1% of outcome variance predicted.

Match prediction outcomes
OPR : 127 of 166  (76.5 %)
CCWM: 124 of 166  (74.7 %)
WMPR: 123 of 166  (74.1 %)

Stdev of testing data winning margin prediction residual with scaled versions of the metrics
Weight:	  1.0	  0.9	  0.8	  0.7	  0.6	  0.5
OPR:	 72.1	 70.8	 70.2	 70.3	 71.2	 72.8
CCWM:	 85.2	 80.3	 76.3	 73.5	 71.9	 71.7
WMPR:	 89.3	 84.3	 80.3	 77.3	 75.4	 74.7


2014: abca
Teams = 35, Matches = 76, Matches Per Team = 2.171

TRAINING DATA
Stdev of winning margin prediction residual
OPR :  59.8.	 65.1% of outcome variance predicted.
CCWM:  62.9.	 61.2% of outcome variance predicted.
WMPR:  51.5.	 74.1% of outcome variance predicted.

Match prediction outcomes
OPR :  63 of  76  (82.9 %)
CCWM:  60 of  76  (78.9 %)
WMPR:  65 of  76  (85.5 %)

TESTING DATA
Stdev of winning margin prediction residual
OPR :  78.9.	 39.1% of outcome variance predicted.
CCWM:  93.6.	 14.4% of outcome variance predicted.
WMPR:  92.5.	 16.3% of outcome variance predicted.

Match prediction outcomes
OPR :  56 of  76  (73.7 %)
CCWM:  55 of  76  (72.4 %)
WMPR:  55 of  76  (72.4 %)

Stdev of testing data winning margin prediction residual with scaled versions of the metrics
Weight:	  1.0	  0.9	  0.8	  0.7	  0.6	  0.5
OPR:	 78.9	 77.9	 77.6	 78.2	 79.6	 81.6
CCWM:	 93.6	 89.5	 86.4	 84.3	 83.4	 83.7
WMPR:	 92.5	 88.8	 86.1	 84.3	 83.6	 84.1


2014: arfa
Teams = 39, Matches = 78, Matches Per Team = 2.000

TRAINING DATA
Stdev of winning margin prediction residual
OPR :  45.8.	 61.4% of outcome variance predicted.
CCWM:  46.6.	 60.1% of outcome variance predicted.
WMPR:  38.2.	 73.1% of outcome variance predicted.

Match prediction outcomes
OPR :  59 of  78  (75.6 %)
CCWM:  66 of  78  (84.6 %)
WMPR:  64 of  78  (82.1 %)

TESTING DATA
Stdev of winning margin prediction residual
OPR :  61.8.	 29.8% of outcome variance predicted.
CCWM:  71.7.	  5.6% of outcome variance predicted.
WMPR:  75.4.	 -4.5% of outcome variance predicted.

Match prediction outcomes
OPR :  55 of  78  (70.5 %)
CCWM:  53 of  78  (67.9 %)
WMPR:  49 of  78  (62.8 %)

Stdev of testing data winning margin prediction residual with scaled versions of the metrics
Weight:	  1.0	  0.9	  0.8	  0.7	  0.6	  0.5
OPR:	 61.8	 61.0	 60.6	 60.8	 61.4	 62.5
CCWM:	 71.7	 68.4	 65.9	 64.1	 63.1	 62.9
WMPR:	 75.4	 71.9	 69.1	 66.9	 65.5	 64.9


2014: azch
Teams = 49, Matches = 82, Matches Per Team = 1.673

TRAINING DATA
Stdev of winning margin prediction residual
OPR :  36.3.	 78.2% of outcome variance predicted.
CCWM:  37.8.	 76.4% of outcome variance predicted.
WMPR:  25.5.	 89.2% of outcome variance predicted.

Match prediction outcomes
OPR :  66 of  79  (83.5 %)
CCWM:  68 of  79  (86.1 %)
WMPR:  73 of  79  (92.4 %)

TESTING DATA
Stdev of winning margin prediction residual
OPR :  52.1.	 54.9% of outcome variance predicted.
CCWM:  67.5.	 24.6% of outcome variance predicted.
WMPR:  63.0.	 34.3% of outcome variance predicted.

Match prediction outcomes
OPR :  59 of  79  (74.7 %)
CCWM:  56 of  79  (70.9 %)
WMPR:  66 of  79  (83.5 %)

Stdev of testing data winning margin prediction residual with scaled versions of the metrics
Weight:	  1.0	  0.9	  0.8	  0.7	  0.6	  0.5
OPR:	 52.1	 52.1	 52.8	 54.2	 56.2	 58.7
CCWM:	 67.5	 65.7	 64.6	 64.1	 64.2	 65.0
WMPR:	 63.0	 59.6	 57.3	 56.1	 56.1	 57.3
__________________
CHEER4FTC website and facebook online FTC resources.
Providing support for FTC Teams in the Charlottesville, VA area and beyond.

Last edited by wgardner : 28-05-2015 at 10:05. Reason: Data was for scaled metrics not unscaled metrics! Updated!
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi