Go to Post Part of FRC is to introduce you to how engineering is in real life: you can't use a redo card if you're landing something on the moon. - The other Gabe [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Motors
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-05-2015, 14:48
FrankJ's Avatar
FrankJ FrankJ is offline
Robot Mentor
FRC #2974 (WALT)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 1,923
FrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Blown CIM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
Easier said than done, if you don't have a dynamometer.
Perhaps consistent or the same would have been better then "known". I was trying to think of simple tests without a lot of instrumentation.

I agree that ohming the motor has limited usefulness. It will tell you if you have open windings or a really bad commutator. Shorted winding look about the same as good windings to a typical ohm meter. Once again things to do with minimal tools.
__________________
If you don't know what you should hook up then you should read a data sheet

Last edited by FrankJ : 29-05-2015 at 15:02.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-06-2015, 13:46
evand4567's Avatar
evand4567 evand4567 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Evan
FRC #2022 (Titan Robotics and Team Neutrino)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Aurora
Posts: 36
evand4567 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Blown CIM?

Did some testing and they definitely are degraded. Thanks for the help.
__________________
Mentor 2022 Titan Robotics, 3928 Team Neutrino 2015-present
Participant 2022 Titan Robotics 2012-2014
2014 Central Illinois Regional Semifinalists- 2081, 292
2012 Midwest Regional Champions- 16,148
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-06-2015, 13:55
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,074
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Blown CIM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by evand4567 View Post
Did some testing and they definitely are degraded. Thanks for the help.
Now you can return the favor.

Please post your test procedure and test results so others may learn from what you did.


  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-06-2015, 21:27
evand4567's Avatar
evand4567 evand4567 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Evan
FRC #2022 (Titan Robotics and Team Neutrino)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Aurora
Posts: 36
evand4567 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Blown CIM?

We tested the resistance with an ohmmeter and found the degraded ones to be between .3 and .5, while the new CIM varied between 5-15 depending on it's position which is strange and I don't really understand what was going on.

Now for the unscientific part: we direct drove a wheel on and found a significant reduction in RPM noticeable to the naked eye. The sound motor sounded significantly slower as well.

That was enough for us to conclude the CIMs were bad, but if there's enough interest and I have the time, I can do some more specific and scientific testing of the motors.
__________________
Mentor 2022 Titan Robotics, 3928 Team Neutrino 2015-present
Participant 2022 Titan Robotics 2012-2014
2014 Central Illinois Regional Semifinalists- 2081, 292
2012 Midwest Regional Champions- 16,148
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-06-2015, 21:53
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,074
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Blown CIM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by evand4567 View Post
We tested the resistance with an ohmmeter and found the degraded ones to be between .3 and .5
.3 and .5 what? ohms? milliohms?


Quote:
while the new CIM varied between 5-15
5-15 what?

Quote:
Now for the unscientific part: we direct drove a wheel on and found a significant reduction in RPM noticeable to the naked eye. The sound motor sounded significantly slower as well.
That's arguably more scientific than measuring resistance.





Last edited by Ether : 02-06-2015 at 14:29.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-06-2015, 14:45
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,074
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Blown CIM?

Quote:
Originally Posted by evand4567 View Post
We tested the resistance with an ohmmeter and found the degraded ones to be between .3 and .5, while the new CIM varied between 5-15 depending on it's position which is strange and I don't really understand what was going on.
Can you please tell us what the .3, .5, and 5-15 numbers are?


Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi