Top 5 robots in each state

[EmmaKay1019]

Originally Posted by Electronica1

I'm not from this area, but what the heck, why not.

Netherlands
1. 4481
2. 5412
3. 4. (and possibly 5.) 4481's other robots

Is 5412 the team from Groningen?

[logank013]

Originally Posted by carpedav000

Indiana (IMO)

1.) 1024
2.) 5188
3.) 1501
4.) 234
5.) 1741

Anyone care to challenge this?

I care to challenge it. 234 should be number 1 or 2. Consistent at 2+ full stacks and 135 was just right up there with us. 135 isn't even on your list but they were doing 2+ stacks as well (with 5 as max height). 5188 was almost there but they weren't as consistent. 1501 was only doing 1 and 1/2 stack so they should be around 5. 1024 was good because they were the only indiana team with good can burglars but weren't near as good as 234, 135, or 5188 at stacking. 1741 could only do 1 5 stack usually but they were good cappers. 1720 should also be mentioned on here somewhere. Best landfill bot in IN I think. My top 5 is
1/2 234 and 135
3 5188
4 1024
5 1720
6 1501
7 1741
8 5402
9. 829
10. 71

Hopefully missed no powerhouse in IN. Thanks for reading.

[Kevin Leonard]

Originally Posted by logank013

I care to challenge it. 234 should be number 1 or 2. Consistent at 2+ full stacks and 135 was just right up there with us. 135 isn't even on your list but they were doing 2+ stacks as well (with 5 as max height). 5188 was almost there but they weren't as consistent. 1501 was only doing 1 and 1/2 stack so they should be around 5. 1024 was good because they were the only indiana team with good can burglars but weren't near as good as 234, 135, or 5188 at stacking. 1741 could only do 1 5 stack usually but they were good cappers. 1720 should also be mentioned on here somewhere. Best landfill bot in IN I think. My top 5 is
1/2 234 and 135
3 5188
4 1024
5 1720
6 1501
7 1741
8 5402
9. 829
10. 71

Hopefully missed no powerhouse in IN. Thanks for reading.

1501 was hitting 2+ stacks throughout Carson.

[logank013]

Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard

1501 was hitting 2+ stacks throughout Carson.

That's great. My analysis was based off state. I can scout state competition but not 8 divisions at worlds. Lol

[Noudvanbrunscho]

Originally Posted by EmmaKay1019

Is 5412 the team from Groningen?

Yep they are indeed.

[RKazmer]

Originally Posted by Lij2015

I'll take a stab at Virginia:

1. 2363/384 (2 capped 6 stacks from HP and some change)
3. 623 (2 capped 5 stacks from HP)
4. 1731 (Only bot I saw pull off 3 tote at the Va regional, landfill 6 stacks)
5. 1086 (Probably the second best landfill bot in our state, most consistent)

I would put 384 slightly above 2363 for consistency in play not to mention that they made Galileo Finals. While 2363 has the 2 capped six stacks, 384 seems a bit faster and more consistent. The thing that 2363 has over 384 is landfill capability.

[The other Gabe]

Originally Posted by RKazmer

I would put 384 slightly above 2363 for consistency in play not to mention that they made Galileo Finals. While 2363 has the 2 capped six stacks, 384 seems a bit faster and more consistent. The thing that 2363 has over 384 is landfill capability.

2 6 stacks from landfill> 2 6 stacks from feeder: landfill is usually much harder. for example, my team could consistently get a capped 6 from the landfill. we ramped from the feeder 1 time and got a capped 6 & uncapped 4, with nearly no practice from that position

[RKazmer]

Originally Posted by The other Gabe

2 6 stacks from landfill> 2 6 stacks from feeder: landfill is usually much harder. for example, my team could consistently get a capped 6 from the landfill. we ramped from the feeder 1 time and got a capped 6 & uncapped 4, with nearly no practice from that position

I do agree. The landfill is one of the harder areas to build for in the game this year. However, the better bot still seemed to be Sparky 384. Triple Helix may have had the more all-around bot, but Sparky seemed to be more consistent and could clear the feeder station during a normal match. So for this year, I would give Sparky #1 and a very very close second to 2363.

[TAlholm]

Originally Posted by cjl2625

From Ty's survey, I've constructed a Top 5 for Connecticut.
This is the combined result based on the 12 submissions.

#1 -- 195: 55 points
#2 -- 2067: 39 points
#3 -- 2836: 26 points
#4 -- 230: 17 points
#5 -- 2170: 14 points

Other teams receiving votes:
228: 12 points
2168: 8 points
175: 5 points
999: 2 points
236: 1 point

All of these teams deserve recognition after the amazing year they've all had.
*Shameless self plug*
After being a part of the 8 point QF4 at Waterbury, 1991 went on to be the #1 pick at Pioneer Valley. May not be good enough for this list, but something worth mentioning.

[Ginger Bread]

Top 5 teams in no particular order from GA

4188 - Columbus
1648 - G3
1311 - Kell
2974 - Walton
4189 - Chargers

This is just my opinion from what I saw at the Xbots off season competition and at the Georgia Southern Classic Regional.

[TDav540]

Originally Posted by RKazmer

I do agree. The landfill is one of the harder areas to build for in the game this year. However, the better bot still seemed to be Sparky 384. Triple Helix may have had the more all-around bot, but Sparky seemed to be more consistent and could clear the feeder station during a normal match. So for this year, I would give Sparky #1 and a very very close second to 2363.

2363 also didn't focus on landfill most of the time. They were mostly a feeder bot. I did see them venture out into the landfill a few times however.

I think they were both quality teams that are basically interchangeable with each other and together form an alliance that is difficult to beat with solely Virginia/Chesapeake teams.

[asid61]

The survey results for CA sometimes don't mention 254. 0.0 I agree with the other usual teams (1678, 1671, 971, 973) but holy cow 254 was amazing this year. Far more dominant than usual, with an OPR of 160 at SVR (and they earned it).

[evanperryg]

Originally Posted by carpedav000

Indiana (IMO)
Anyone care to challenge this?

Yep.
1) 234
2) 135
3) 1720
4) 5188
5) 1501

Originally Posted by asid61

Far more dominant than usual, with an OPR of 160 at SVR (and they earned it).

"Far more dominant" you mean they singlehandedly outscored every other robot in the world on a regular basis?

1) 254
2) 1678
3) 973
4) 971
5) 1671

Here's a couple others:
Minnesota
1) 3130
2) 2512
3) 2502
4) 2052
5) 2169

Idaho
1)2122
2)2122
3)2122
4)2122
5)...is there another team in idaho...

Missouri:
1)1730
2)1806
3)1986
4)3284
5)1723

[Kevin Leonard]

Originally Posted by evanperryg

Yep.
1) 234
2) 135
3) 1720
4) 5188
5) 1501



"Far more dominant" you mean they singlehandedly outscored every other robot in the world on a regular basis?

1) 254
2) 1678
3) 973
4) 971
5) 1671

Here's a couple others:
Minnesota
1) 3130
2) 2512
3) 2502
4) 2052
5) 2169

Idaho
1)2122
2)2122
3)2122
4)2122
5)...is there another team in idaho...

Missouri:
1)1730
2)1806
3)1986
4)3284
5)1723

I think you need to include 1717 in your CA list. All of the robots below were either the #1 pick or #1 seed in their division, and while 1671 was obviously incredible, they were a much later pick and didn't have the upsides of some of the other machines on this list. (3476 would also go above 1671 due to their higher point ceiling).
1) 254 (Carson #1 seed)
2) 1678 (Newton #1 pick)
3) 1717 (Carver #1 pick)
4) 973 (Carson #1 pick)
5) 971 (Carver #1 seed)

[MikLast]

Originally Posted by evanperryg

Idaho
1)2122
2)2122
3)2122
4)2122
5)...is there another team in idaho...

yes, about 15...