Go to Post I hope that all of our new members are as helpful as the one above. We will be in for an amazing season if that is the case. - Greg Needel [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-06-2015, 13:10
carpedav000's Avatar
carpedav000 carpedav000 is offline
Studenting is hard, but worth it!
AKA: David Carpenter
no team (Jerry-Rigg school of DuctTapeology)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 475
carpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant future
Re: State Power Alliances 2015

Quote:
Originally Posted by tindleroot View Post
I didn't see 1741, 1720, or 71 at worlds (more than maybe a passing glance), but here's my take:

At ISC, I think personally 1720 was the best, but 71 was a little more consistent (probably why they were picked by 3rd seed 1501). 1741 was definitely the best at getting cans from the step accurately with the claw. As far as worlds goes, it looks like 1720 had the edge again given that they had the highest average of the three teams and seeded 6th in Newton (same division as 1741). For these reasons I feel like 1720 would be the best fit for an Indiana alliance, but that being said I did not see the teams enough at worlds to make the best judgment.
Okay, upon re-watching a lot of match video of all three teams, Ive come to this conclusion (not including can grabbing because all three teams have very accurate 1-can grabbers):

1720- Definitely the best IN landfill bot if you are looking for large amounts of points.
Biggest advantage: Fast tote intake
Biggest disadvantage: slow(ish) lift
Max. scoring ability: 2 36-point stacks

1741- Container specialist that can also stack from landfill
Biggest advantage: Able to cap stacks of 6
Biggest disadvantage: Rear 4-bar arm makes maneuvering the left landfill difficult once stacks start going up.
Max. scoring ability: 1 36 point stack and a stack of 4

71- Very good all-around landfill bot. Most consistent of the three robots
Biggest advantage: Faster lift
Biggest disadvantege: Their containers tend to roll of of their stacks
Max. scoring ability: 1 capped 4-stack and an uncapped stack of 5
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi