|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
Hello all you gadget geeks!
I'm looking into purchasing a USB attached oscilloscope. These are sometimes referred to as USB DSO, or PC oscilloscopes. Regardless of what you call them, they perform the data acquisition that is then sent to a PC for measurement and display. I already own an ancient analog Tektronix scope without storage. I's big, heavy and does not allow post acquisition analysis. The fact that I am a tight wad also means I would like to keep the cost down, way down! So, I'm looking for recommendations. Does anyone own either of these two, and would you buy it again? Hantek 6022BE SainSmart DDS120 Are there other USB DSO's you might prefer to these in a price range that is not too much higher? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
Quote:
http://www.seeedstudio.com/depot/dso...ope-p-736.html More portable and 4 channels. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
Quote:
I used to own a USB based DSO from Parallax that fit the description of what is being sought. It was very basic but it worked well for most of my college projects. Having something with protocol sniffing is nice these days though. Honestly, for $70-$80, try one of them out and let us know. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
Maybe one of these guys? https://www.saleae.com/
Depends what you're trying to do with it, it started off as just a logic analyzer, they added the analog features recently. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
If you dive into oscilloscopes deep enough you will quickly realize you get what you pay for.
I agree with Marshall the Rigol DSO are nice and great for the price but the price for the other units mentioned in the OP are just too low. A serious risk that is taken with such low prices is compromises in the analog front end that increase the likelihood of incorrect readings and coupling into the circuit under test. Depending on what you are measuring this could actually result in damage to something. The other risk is that there are limits in the digital sampling performance and transfer capability. The result being spurious readings or poor capture of incidents that might be important to the viewer. Watch for dirty things with cheap DSO like listing the sampling rate of the ADC advertised as the maximum useful frequency the DSO can be used on. Anywhere approaching Nyquist rate and such advertisements are generally baseless with some exceptions that you are not likely to find in cheap hardware. More on this from National Instruments So basically if you've got a 10Msps ADC you can probably capture barely viable information on up to 5MHz and really probably will find the best use down below 1MHz. A little more on this Now let's add to the mix that we've put USB in there and assume you want the minimum of USB2. So assuming you want to free run this oscilloscope you have 60MBps (480Mbps) max into the PC without some compression. So unless you are running burst measurements in which the data stays in the external device till it fills, that is a hypothetical limit of 60Msps with just 256 vertical steps (256 potential voltages readings vertically in 1 byte and let us cheat and assume we deliver the digitized signal AC coupled with a DC offset value such that DC offset at the analog input does not play havoc). Any more vertical resolution and your maximum horizontal sampling rate pays for it. So maybe at 12 bits per sample you could max shove 40Msps down an USB2 interface. In reality without some messing around that's not a whole lot when you consider the information above. So maybe with some simple compression and messing around one can wiggle an 8MHz 12bit DSO out of an USB2 port and we are making some very real assumptions about what your computer can actually handle. That written, you can get the PicoScope that can greatly exceed those limits and the trick is the way they manage the interface and the cost of doing it shows in the price of the unit. I've had too many bad experiences with these cheap oscilloscopes in the hands of inexperienced users to make a suggestion for any of them without making protection circuits. At the point you are willing to lay down the cash for the PicoScope you are quickly getting into the Rigol price range. I'll just add this: Useful follow up Last edited by techhelpbb : 08-06-2015 at 00:12. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
I'll agree...you really do get what you pay for. 20MHz is pretty trash for an oscilloscope, and don't bother with the salaea unless you need a logic analyzer. Having the mixed signal analysis capabilities can be very useful, only need analog capabilities, the Rigol's the way to go. I bought my 50 MHz one only because I knew I could mod it to have 100 MHz capability. An alternate solution is to check out local university surplus sales. Sometimes they have scopes in there for real cheap.
Last edited by Michael Hill : 08-06-2015 at 15:42. |
|
#7
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
This may be my final approach once I have weighed out all my options. Quote:
Quote:
Now this is an idea I had not considered. I will definitely look into this option! THANKS!! |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
Another place to get used test equipment cheap: try Hamventions/Hamfests
http://hamvention.org/ ARRL Hamfest search The Parallax oscilloscope based on the Parallax Propeller: https://www.parallax.com/product/32220 $199 Last edited by techhelpbb : 08-06-2015 at 13:50. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
Quote:
I have a DS1074Z (DS1054Z wasn't out yet), and enjoy it. Both scopes can be turned into DS1104Z's quickly and easily, but I don't think it's exactly legal. Some have proposed that it's a intentional "oversight" by Rigol, but I haven't followed the situation that closely. AFAIK, the same possibility existed with the previous model line as well. Read into that as you will. It's $400, but far more usable than anything else in the thread. "Buy once, cry once" might apply here if you can scrape up the money. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
Quote:
And by modding the software, it was literally change the model number from DS1052E to DS1102E, and that magically changed everything. Now, when it comes to calibration, that may be the only issued. They were all calibrated as 50 MHz scopes, not 100 MHz. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
Quote:
![]() You gotta know where to look and when. I've got 4 or 5 scopes I bought at the Dayton Hamvention and yes some are older but they work. I've also got some IC programmers and other tools I bought at a local Hamfest. Where else can $25 buy you a Tektronix 'doghouse' vacuum tube oscilloscope? Last edited by techhelpbb : 08-06-2015 at 20:58. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
I have a Hantek DS0-2100 that works great, but they stopped updating the USB driver for it after Windows xp. I have to boot XP in a virtual machine to use it. I'm leery to buy or recommend another Hantek product. Customer support is non-existent.
How about bit-scope? http://www.bitscope.com/#overview There is also a scope for a ipad: https://www.oscium.com/oscilloscopes/imso-104 |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: USB DSO aka PC oscilloscope recomendations
I want to thank you all for your thoughtful input.
Because of it, I decided to wait and purchase a bench scope. Fortunately my wonderful wife said Father's Day was excuse enough to buy one. So, here is what I have decided upon. Siglent SDS1072CML. I believe for my purposes, this will be an excellent choice. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|