|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Overview and Analysis of FIRST Stats
hi all,
i'm not nearly on your level of mathematics, as i'm only about to graduate high school. but for my final project of my AP statistics class, i did a study on FRC playoff performances by alliances ranked 1-8. there are a lot of problems with my study and i'm not afraid to admit it in terms of hypothesis testing and whatnot, so i'll just provide some statistics that i found interesting. if anyone wants the python script i used to download the data i can provide it. The #1 seed alliances won 71% of regionals, districts, and district championships this year (so it does not include world champ data nor exhibition data). The #1 seed alliances failed to advance past quarterfinals in just 4 of 109 events. For the second place alliance, the #1 and #2 seeds made up 54% of those. This does not account for which alliance finished first. The #8 alliances did not win a single event. Also, the #8 alliances made it to finals only 4 times. The #7 alliance won a single event (Finger Lakes / NYRO). The #7 alliances finished second place only twice. The #3, #4, #5, and #6 seeds were victorious in 5, 2, 4, and 5 events overall, respectively. Thus, the #1 and #2 alliances contributed to 84.4% of event victories. The mean points per game for all 8 alliances (total number of points worldwide divided by total number of games worldwide) were: 145, 108, 90, 80, 75, 75, 70, 60. (these are rough numbers as i'm reading them off a png image and i'm too lazy to download the excel file again, heres some more stats on points per game overall: https://i.imgur.com/dgIYLrQ.png ) some interesting stuff i guess. I'd be interested to do more with OPR/CCWM/CPR/EPR and whatnot once I get more experience with maths. might be a little bit though ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|