Go to Post There is a really bad trap most people fall into, when presented with data they tend to trust it. This is dangerous. - Andrew Schreiber [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-06-2015, 09:38
AGPapa's Avatar
AGPapa AGPapa is offline
Registered User
AKA: Antonio Papa
FRC #5895
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Robbinsville, NJ
Posts: 323
AGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond reputeAGPapa has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Overview and Analysis of FIRST Stats

Quote:
Originally Posted by wgardner View Post
Thanks, AGPapa! I wonder if you could do the following:

1. Could you report the average squared error in the scores and/or winning margin, in addition to the probability of correct match outcome?

2. Your runs were using 150 values as the "training set" and 17 as the "testing set". Could you run them with other splits, like using 50 or 100 matches as training and the remaining part as testing? It would be interesting to see how the different techniques perform as the tournament progresses.

Cheers.
Here's the average squared error in the match scores.

LS OPR (no prior): 3555.75
MMSE OPR (Oavg prior) : 3088.70
MMSE OPR (World OPR prior): 2973.91
MMSE OPR (regressed World OPR prior): 3000.04


I'll work on the 50 and 100 match splits and put them up later.

EDIT: I think I should elaborate a bit more on how I'm doing the priors. I've been adding a constant to everyone's World OPR so that the average of the OPRs is equal to Oavg. Essentially I'm saying that every robot improved by a constant. (These constants are very small, only Archimedes was greater than 1.5 points)
__________________
Team 2590 Student [2011-2014]
Team 5684 Mentor [2015]
Team 5895 Mentor [2016-]

Last edited by AGPapa : 11-06-2015 at 09:46.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi