Go to Post Luck *good or bad* and opportunity will always affect what happens to teams. - Brian C [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 8 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #46   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-06-2015, 23:00
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,832
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by artK View Post
Why not just not get data points that you can't verify in the pit? It saves time and reduces the amount of noise in your data.
That's kind of the point of the "detector". If you aren't at least looking in the pits, it's kind of odd... but it's not that hard to find a team that is using favorable numbers when you do.

For example, let's say your pit scouts talk to a team about their stacking. And they say that they can do two 6-stacks, uncapped. Sounds reasonable, right? I can see teams going for that this year. But what YOU don't know--necessarily--is that that's their design/non-interference/non-spec (and, in non--RR games, non-defense) field number. The real number, as your scouts find by observation, is that they're actually doing 1 6 stack, or maybe 3 3-stacks, or one 4-stack and one 2-stack.

Basically, it's not the data points that you can't verify that you get from the pit that are the problem--most teams can verify anything they get from the pit scouts. It's that many teams will be optimistic--I don't accuse them of lying outright--but this is a physics problem. (Read: Equations (gameplay) work out nicely in the theoretical frictionless vacuum world, not quite so well in reality.) Then the verification shows that optimism to be misplaced.


My opinion on pit scouting is actually a bit different than most people's. My personal opinion is that it's NOT about the robot when you're scouting in the pit. The only thing you do with the robot is to take a picture (remind the field scouts what this robot looks like), and maybe note what work is being done. The TEAM is far more important, in terms of getting to know them. Let the match scouts collect the data on whether the team works on the field: if two teams work well together and are good friends, and both have decent robots, look out in eliminations if they're on the same alliance.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #47   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-06-2015, 10:33
IronicDeadBird's Avatar
IronicDeadBird IronicDeadBird is offline
Theory Crafting Fo days...
AKA: Charles Ives "M" Waldo IV
FRC #1339 (Angelbots)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 958
IronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by evanperryg View Post
Robot ideas/strategic design ideas can come from anyone, but actual match strategy is done exclusively by the strategy team members. For the sake of simplicity, I will consider strategic design apart from event strategy. Our strategy "subteam" is students from any tehnical/business subteam that is interested in strategy, understands it well, and can communicate effectively in a scouting meeting. Scouters are any student not in the pit, who aren't presenting chairman's, who have been trained on our scouting app. Here's our hierarchy for the scouting team:
Code:
Lead Strategist
         |-------------------------------------------------------------------|
Lead Scout                                                                   |
         |------------------------------------------|                        |
Match Scouters (~20ish)      Qualitative Scouters(3-5)          Pit scouters (1-2)
Lead strategist: Develops match strategy with the drive team. Collects data aggregated by the lead scout, and processes it with Tableau and MS Access. Manages pit scouters, collects information as they see necessary for developing strategy and picklists.Assembles the shift schedule for match scouting before each event.

Lead scout: Develops the match scouting interface, i.e. scouting app or paper sheets. Aggregates data from qualitative scouters and match scouters, to be collected by the lead strategist. Makes sure match scouters and qualitative scouters are focused, comfortable and are attending their shifts.

Match scouters: collect qualitative data using the scouting app. Work 2-3 2 hour shifts per event. Makes sure that the lead scout has collected their data before leaving their shift.

Qualitative scouters: dont have a schedule, but scout for 75-100% of matches out of their own enthusiasm. Collect qualitative data from matches, including notes about what a team did, why they did it, speculation on a team's strategic potential, etc. Extremely important in scouting meetings, as these are the students who see the most matches, and can provide excellent feedback on almost any team.

Pit scouters: collect general technical information on every team at the beginning of the event. They also do not have a predefined schedule, but are called upon by the lead strategist when they are needed. They will be frequently called upon Saturday morning to get last-minute, very specific info needed to make the picklist as strong as possible. Our picklist meetings include the lead mentor, drive team, lead strategist, lead scout, and qualitative scouters.
Ah that makes sense the strategy activity is during comp I take it.
__________________
HERO 俺を讃える声や 喝采なんて 欲しくはないさ
So I got my jacket back, but it turns out the "W" in WPI doesn't stand for that steak sauce I can't pronounce.
Play is for kids this is serious...
  #48   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-06-2015, 17:02
artK artK is offline
Just Another Person
AKA: Art Kalb
no team (No Team)
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 119
artK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
That's kind of the point of the "detector". If you aren't at least looking in the pits, it's kind of odd... but it's not that hard to find a team that is using favorable numbers when you do.

My opinion on pit scouting is actually a bit different than most people's. My personal opinion is that it's NOT about the robot when you're scouting in the pit. The only thing you do with the robot is to take a picture (remind the field scouts what this robot looks like), and maybe note what work is being done. The TEAM is far more important, in terms of getting to know them. Let the match scouts collect the data on whether the team works on the field: if two teams work well together and are good friends, and both have decent robots, look out in eliminations if they're on the same alliance.
I'm not suggesting looking at the pits at all. My opinion about pit scouting is: get a good picture, get a look at the drivebase (just to get an idea of what there driving might look like), record important dimensions (can the robot fit under a pyramid, does it drive long or wide when balancing). It got all the information we could want that match scouts usually can't get by watching a match, without any risk of memory biases being introduced into your data, and was relatively simple (a championship divisions worth of pit scouting could be kept on like 4 sides of paper).
__________________
Art Kalb
Team 254 (2011-2014): Head Scout, Programmer
2011, 2014 World Champions
  #49   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-06-2015, 17:18
jajabinx124's Avatar
jajabinx124 jajabinx124 is offline
Team 2052 Alumnus
AKA: Kshitij Wavre
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 541
jajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by artK View Post
It got all the information we could want that match scouts usually can't get by watching a match
The definition of pit scouting in my book is asking teams questions about their robot that can't be answered through match scouting. Limit pit scouting to data your actually going to use(anything that can't be answered through match scouting) or in other words like you said, keep it simple(actual questions can be complex, but not redundant to what your match scouters are observing). Don't ask teams questions you can answer through match scouting because It'll be a waste of time and It'll be a pain on Friday night going through redundant pit scouting data.
__________________
FRC Volunteer CSA (MRI off-season event, 2017 Lake Superior Regional, 2017 10,000 Lakes Regional) 2016 - Present
FRC 2052 KnightKrawler (Team Captain, Strategist, Scouting, Programming) 2013 - 2016

1 Division Win & Einstein Appearance
3 Division Quarter-Finalists
1 Regional Chairman's Award
5 Regional Wins, 3 Regional Finalists
3 MN State Championship Wins, 1 MN State Championship Finalist
Thanks to all our alliance partners who krawled with us: 41, 70, 225, 525, 1595, 2054, 2062, 2122, 2175, 2227, 2472, 2526, 2883, 2990, 3018, 3244, 3276, 3310, 3313, 3360, 3538, 3692, 4011, 4198, 4536, 4607, 4778, 5172, 5690
  #50   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-06-2015, 18:30
Citrus Dad's Avatar
Citrus Dad Citrus Dad is offline
Business and Scouting Mentor
AKA: Richard McCann
FRC #1678 (Citrus Circuits)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Davis
Posts: 994
Citrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by jajabinx124 View Post
The definition of pit scouting in my book is asking teams questions about their robot that can't be answered through match scouting. Limit pit scouting to data your actually going to use(anything that can't be answered through match scouting) or in other words like you said, keep it simple(actual questions can be complex, but not redundant to what your match scouters are observing). Don't ask teams questions you can answer through match scouting because It'll be a waste of time and It'll be a pain on Friday night going through redundant pit scouting data.
I agree. The last two years we have done extensive pit scouting on a couple of elements that couldn't be discerned from the stands. Last year it was pass through time and reliability because many teams weren't doing this enough to get a good measure (and we walked around with a watch and clipboard). And this year of course we were looking for the ability to add cangrabbers. Perhaps the biggest plus was being able to get to know teams about a specific issue. We both got to know how amenable they were and also just simply connected. We now intentionally try to come up with a specific pit scouting task like this.
__________________
  #51   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-06-2015, 19:56
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,832
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by artK View Post
I'm not suggesting looking at the pits at all.
"Why not just not get data points that you can't verify in the pit?" Guess you're a stereotypical English-challenged engineer; that's a multi-negative and an unclear prepositional reference in the same sentence. What I initially read was something more like: "Why not just get data points in the pit that you can verify?" If I could rewrite the initial statement to what you meant: "Why not only get data when you're pit scouting that you can't verify on the field?"

And if that is what you meant, then my response is: What data do you mean?

Just about any key data point that you could pick up in the pit--like the ones you mentioned--can also be picked up on the field, given time. The biggest difference is that if you get it in the pit area, you might get it faster (given that teams don't always play all their cards on the field at any one time).

That being said, I'm sure there are exceptions to that: inter-team dynamics, and what improvements they're planning on (or can be persuaded to adopt), are two of the ones that come to mind. Oh, and the all-important one for a top seed: What the odds of them accepting your selection are...
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #52   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-06-2015, 20:03
Michael Hill's Avatar
Michael Hill Michael Hill is offline
Registered User
FRC #3138 (Innovators Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,580
Michael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Hill has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by Citrus Dad View Post
I agree. The last two years we have done extensive pit scouting on a couple of elements that couldn't be discerned from the stands. Last year it was pass through time and reliability because many teams weren't doing this enough to get a good measure (and we walked around with a watch and clipboard). And this year of course we were looking for the ability to add cangrabbers. Perhaps the biggest plus was being able to get to know teams about a specific issue. We both got to know how amenable they were and also just simply connected. We now intentionally try to come up with a specific pit scouting task like this.
Ya, we had the weirdest pit scouting questions last year (out of pit scouting questions we've been asked). They were mostly about drive team experience. For example, we asked how much experience the drivers had, how much practice time they had with that particular robot and drivetrain. Took note whether or not the coach was a student or mentor and how many much experience they had. A lot of that is valuable information. For example, our drive team is 100% students. However, when discussing strategies, there were numerous occasions where an adult coach would "bully" the other two student coaches into playing their strategy. If we noted that their coach is a mentor, we also send a mentor to the strategy sessions; not to really participate, but to maintain a presence. We've found that if another mentor is present, those problems tend to go away. We also ask questions about what the intent of the robot (specifically worded to extract intent of the design). That way, we are able to juxtapose that with how they are doing (and if they are performing to expectations).
  #53   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-06-2015, 23:29
artK artK is offline
Just Another Person
AKA: Art Kalb
no team (No Team)
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 119
artK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond reputeartK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
Guess you're a stereotypical English-challenged engineer;
Yeah. I know I am not a good writer (I usually revise my posts a fair bit to compensate for this, like five minutes just writing this sentence out).

Quote:
And if that is what you meant, then my response is: What data do you mean?

Just about any key data point that you could pick up in the pit--like the ones you mentioned--can also be picked up on the field, given time. The biggest difference is that if you get it in the pit area, you might get it faster (given that teams don't always play all their cards on the field at any one time).

That being said, I'm sure there are exceptions to that: inter-team dynamics, and what improvements they're planning on (or can be persuaded to adopt), are two of the ones that come to mind.
The rationale I have for pit scouting being really simple is because pit scouting usually happens during practice day, and a lot can change between then and drafting. But some things, like a drivebase or height, usually don't change between those points, or are changed for a match for some specific strategy.

With respect for inter-team dynamics and improvements, most of that analysis can be done informally by the drive team and pit crew in preparation for matches, especially since they'll be the ones working directly with them during matches.
__________________
Art Kalb
Team 254 (2011-2014): Head Scout, Programmer
2011, 2014 World Champions
  #54   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-06-2015, 00:33
GeeTwo's Avatar
GeeTwo GeeTwo is offline
Technical Director
AKA: Gus Michel II
FRC #3946 (Tiger Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 3,770
GeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by artK View Post
The rationale I have for pit scouting being really simple is because pit scouting usually happens during practice day, and a lot can change between then and drafting. But some things, like a drivebase or height, usually don't change between those points, or are changed for a match for some specific strategy.
Pit scouting is also essential for strategy in the first few rounds, especially if a robot didn't play many practice rounds, or calibrated and tested during practice rounds rather than competing. If you base your strategy on an assumption that your adversaries can do 90% of what pit scouts report, and your allies can do 50% of what pit scouts report, you'll usually do better than if you start from scratch.
It may also help the field scouts select which robot each will watch. For example, if Bill and Carol watch most of the landfill 'bots and Mary, Frank, and Ted watch most of the feeder station 'bots, results are likely to be more consistent than if assignments are random.
__________________

If you can't find time to do it right, how are you going to find time to do it over?
If you don't pass it on, it never happened.
Robots are great, but inspiration is the reason we're here.
Friends don't let friends use master links.
  #55   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-06-2015, 00:56
gblake's Avatar
gblake gblake is offline
6th Gear Developer; Mentor
AKA: Blake Ross
no team (6th Gear)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,943
gblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

I'll bet EricH and ArtK would quickly meet in the middle if they both agreed scouts should collect data that drivers, etc. want and will actually use; and that scouts shouldn't waste time collecting any other data (unless they have time to waste); and that scouts should get the needed data from wherever it is available, regardless of where that is.

If you need data from the pits, go get it. If you don't, don't do scouting there.

People shouldn't have the job of pit scouting, they should have the job of getting needed data; if you know what I mean.
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
  #56   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-06-2015, 08:05
Kevin Leonard Kevin Leonard is offline
Professional Stat Padder
FRC #5254 (HYPE), FRC #20 (The Rocketeers)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,254
Kevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by gblake View Post
I'll bet EricH and ArtK would quickly meet in the middle if they both agreed scouts should collect data that drivers, etc. want and will actually use; and that scouts shouldn't waste time collecting any other data (unless they have time to waste); and that scouts should get the needed data from wherever it is available, regardless of where that is.

If you need data from the pits, go get it. If you don't, don't do scouting there.

People shouldn't have the job of pit scouting, they should have the job of getting needed data; if you know what I mean.
I agree with you for the most part, but sometimes its difficult to tell at the beginning of the season exactly what data is going to be the most important.

For example, in 2014 Team 20 thought that the amount of time the robot possessed the ball was going to be extremely important, and that our second pick would be largely based on that. As it turned out, that was completely unimportant, and our match scouts did far more work than necessary getting that information, and things like "What drivebase does Team X have?" and "How smart are their drivers and how well do we work with them?", both of which rely at least partially on pit scouting.

However, assuming you have the manpower to make it happen (not something Team 20 lacks), it's always better to have more data than not enough.

If you don't have the manpower to make it happen, either team up with another team so you gain the manpower, or find a way to narrow the data collection to only what is essential.
__________________
All of my posts are my opinion only and do not reflect the views of my associated teams.
College Student Mentor on Team 5254, HYPE - Helping Youth Pursue Excellence
(2015-Present)
Alumni of Team 20, The Rocketeers (2011-2014)
I'm attempting a robotics blog. Check it out at RocketHypeRobotics.wordpress.com Updated 10/26/16
  #57   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-06-2015, 12:45
GeeTwo's Avatar
GeeTwo GeeTwo is offline
Technical Director
AKA: Gus Michel II
FRC #3946 (Tiger Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 3,770
GeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by gblake View Post
I'll bet EricH and ArtK would quickly meet in the middle if they both agreed scouts should collect data that drivers, etc. want and will actually use; and that scouts shouldn't waste time collecting any other data (unless they have time to waste); and that scouts should get the needed data from wherever it is available, regardless of where that is.
Yes, I concur that this thread has reached the point of (verbally) violent agreement.
__________________

If you can't find time to do it right, how are you going to find time to do it over?
If you don't pass it on, it never happened.
Robots are great, but inspiration is the reason we're here.
Friends don't let friends use master links.
  #58   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-06-2015, 13:15
IronicDeadBird's Avatar
IronicDeadBird IronicDeadBird is offline
Theory Crafting Fo days...
AKA: Charles Ives "M" Waldo IV
FRC #1339 (Angelbots)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 958
IronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

*INCOMING CONTROVERSIAL STATEMENT*

I'm truly surprised at how intensive some of you guys are with scouting during competition. I mean to be fair this year was the first time I was faced with having to make a pick list. But scouting didn't effect match to match strategy as much as Q'ing up did...
__________________
HERO 俺を讃える声や 喝采なんて 欲しくはないさ
So I got my jacket back, but it turns out the "W" in WPI doesn't stand for that steak sauce I can't pronounce.
Play is for kids this is serious...
  #59   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-06-2015, 13:20
connor.worley's Avatar
connor.worley connor.worley is offline
Registered User
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Berkeley/San Diego
Posts: 601
connor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronicDeadBird View Post
*INCOMING CONTROVERSIAL STATEMENT*

I'm truly surprised at how intensive some of you guys are with scouting during competition. I mean to be fair this year was the first time I was faced with having to make a pick list. But scouting didn't effect match to match strategy as much as Q'ing up did...
2nd round picks win worlds...
__________________
Team 973 (2016-???)
Team 5499 (2015-2016)
Team 254 (2014-2015)

Team 1538 (2011-2014)
2014 Driver (25W 17L 1T)
日本語でOK
  #60   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-06-2015, 13:24
IronicDeadBird's Avatar
IronicDeadBird IronicDeadBird is offline
Theory Crafting Fo days...
AKA: Charles Ives "M" Waldo IV
FRC #1339 (Angelbots)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 958
IronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Strategy Sub-Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by connor.worley View Post
2nd round picks win worlds...
Well that and caffeine...
__________________
HERO 俺を讃える声や 喝采なんて 欲しくはないさ
So I got my jacket back, but it turns out the "W" in WPI doesn't stand for that steak sauce I can't pronounce.
Play is for kids this is serious...
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:07.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi