Go to Post ASPCA would be happy to know you are petting your watchdog rather than kicking it. - Ether [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-06-2015, 13:41
Nathan Streeter's Avatar
Nathan Streeter Nathan Streeter is offline
FIRST Fan(atic)
FRC #1519 (Mechanical MAYHEM)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 671
Nathan Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Streeter has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Streeter has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Octocanum Concept V2

Looks much improved! It looks like the pod would be plenty robust (perhaps a little beefier-than-needed even), but I usually prefer to air on the side of over-engineered in the first iteration of a design.

Regarding the pod actuation, I would recommend - if possible - actuating it in such a way that you get a mechanical advantage rather than a disadvantage. In this case (with the moment arm from piston-to-rotation being shorter than the moment arm of actuating-wheel-to-rotation), you'll need the piston to push with more force than 25-50% of the robot's weight. Mounting the piston somewhat-vertically over the last standoff on the module would achieve a mechanical advantage, but frame integration is really only worse with that...

Does anyone on here have experience with cantilevered butterfly/octocanum? We've never tried cantilevering the axles on our butterfly (although we did consider it for maintenance reasons), but it might be reasonable... If you do it, I'd definitely recommend working hard to minimize the distance from your wheels to the main frame piece, and to make your frame as wide a box as is reasonable. The loading for a cantilevered octocanum/butterfly is a lot more intense than the typical WCD; you have the typical driving torque and weighted bending, but also the forces applied by the actuated wheel the piston when in traction mode are going to be powerful torques. Our shafts were simply-supported 1/2" tube shafts... I liked them alot, but we built it around a fully-enclosed sheet metal 'tube' that also housed the actuation pistons. They didn't need to transmit torque because we had the CIMs mesh directly to a gear on the first wheel.
__________________
"If you want to build a ship, don't drum up men to gather wood, divide the work, or give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
"The fight is won or lost far away from witnesses - behind the lines, in the gym, and out there on the road, long before I dance under those lights." - Muhammad Ali
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." - Leonardo da Vinci


Student: 2006-2010 (#1519)
Mentor: 2011-Present (#1519)



Last edited by Nathan Streeter : 18-06-2015 at 16:29.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-06-2015, 13:50
Kevin Leonard Kevin Leonard is offline
Professional Stat Padder
FRC #5254 (HYPE), FRC #20 (The Rocketeers)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,250
Kevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Octocanum Concept V2

In the same vein as what Ty and Nathan suggested, you don't need that much clearance between your retracted traction wheel and the ground, and you could use a lot more mechanical advantage to make actuation easier, so what if you mounted a shorter piston right above the traction wheel. This increases the lever arm and decreases the throw for both faster actuation and more mechanical advantage.

Play around with different setups like that and see what seems to be the best setup you can in that configuration.

As far as being cantilevered octocanum modules go, I feel like it should be fine, as long as it's well-put together, and so is the rest of the robot (including bumpers). But I have no experience with it.
__________________
All of my posts are my opinion only and do not reflect the views of my associated teams.
College Student Mentor on Team 5254, HYPE - Helping Youth Pursue Excellence
(2015-Present)
Alumni of Team 20, The Rocketeers (2011-2014)
I'm attempting a robotics blog. Check it out at RocketHypeRobotics.wordpress.com Updated 10/26/16
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-06-2015, 21:06
Scott Kozutsky's Avatar
Scott Kozutsky Scott Kozutsky is offline
Registered User
FRC #0865
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 123
Scott Kozutsky will become famous soon enough
Re: pic: Octocanum Concept V2

The traction wheel does not need to lift up that far. If you flip the traction and mecanum wheels around you could easily get away with a .25in liftoff distance (also, as previously stated, you get a longer wheelbase when you need it most). It will probably also be easier to pull the end of the traction wheel down instead of the module horizontally. You're also likely on the traction wheel for a very short time so you could easily get away with a much smaller wheel (like 2.5 inches or less in diameter). That versablock is also getting cantilevered pretty far, I'd watch out for that. Hex bearings are infamous for breaking under those kinds of conditions (but have also been improved since I last heard that was a problem).
__________________
2010-2012 FRC 865 Warp7 Student, Mechanical
2013 FRC 1310 RUNNYMEDE ROBOTICS Student, Mechanical, Design
2014 FRC 865 Warp7 Student, Mechanical, Design
2015 FRC 865 Warp7 Alumni, Mechanical Mentor

Last edited by Scott Kozutsky : 18-06-2015 at 21:08.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-06-2015, 21:34
Electronica1's Avatar
Electronica1 Electronica1 is offline
Former Design and CAD Captain 1086
AKA: Alexander Kaplan
FRC #0401 (Copperhead Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Glen Allen
Posts: 344
Electronica1 has a reputation beyond reputeElectronica1 has a reputation beyond reputeElectronica1 has a reputation beyond reputeElectronica1 has a reputation beyond reputeElectronica1 has a reputation beyond reputeElectronica1 has a reputation beyond reputeElectronica1 has a reputation beyond reputeElectronica1 has a reputation beyond reputeElectronica1 has a reputation beyond reputeElectronica1 has a reputation beyond reputeElectronica1 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Octocanum Concept V2

You should be good with having two different size wheels in contact with the ground since you are using belt which should be able to handle it. As others have said, you don't need to lift the traction wheel up that far.

Also, have you thought about integrating the gearbox into the module? (see 488, 148, and 2826)

Have you had experience with 16 ft/s with mecanum? My team usually sticks around 14 ft/s with mecanum since it still gives you the power you need to strafe (mostly).
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-06-2015, 21:25
Chak Chak is offline
Registered User
AKA: Thomas
FRC #4159 (Cardinalbotics)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: May 2015
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: San Francisco, California, USA
Posts: 255
Chak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant future
Re: pic: Octocanum Concept V2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Streeter View Post
Does anyone on here have experience with cantilevered butterfly/octocanum?
We did cantilevered octocanum for our 2015 robot, in a similar setup to what is in this thread. We ended up popping the inner race on quite a few of those old Andymark bearings, so we switched to their new HD bearings. After that it worked fine through 2 regionals.
This is just anecdotal evidence though.
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-06-2015, 22:03
Abhishek R Abhishek R is offline
Registered User
FRC #0624
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 892
Abhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond reputeAbhishek R has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Octocanum Concept V2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Streeter View Post
Does anyone on here have experience with cantilevered butterfly/octocanum?
We ran a cantilevered butterfly/nonadrive variant in 2014. Worked without issue throughout 8 different competitions, including as and against some of the heaviest defense at Championships and IRI.
__________________
2012 - 2015 : 624 CRyptonite
Team Website
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:13.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi